See also: IRC log
<scribe> scribenick: Kirk
<scribe> Scribe: Kirk Wilson
<johnarwe_> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2009May/att-0012/20090518-sml-minutes.html
Minutes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2009May/att-0012/20090518-sml-minutes.html
Resolution: Approved by unanimous consent.
No new Action items
Len: comments are basically editorial
Kirk: Agrees and is working on them. Still needs to look into the hover problem on "Back to Contents" link.
RESOLUTION: Consensus that there is no need to review the document once the changes are made.
Len: New version is ready to be posted to answer the comment raised by Kirk.
<lencharest> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2007/xml/sml/xlink-note.html?rev=1.8&content-type=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1
Len: Also need to change the wording for the XML reference to match that which in the SML spec.
Kirk: One minor wording change needs to be made: "this specification" --> "SML specification".
Len: Question on wording in
section 2 item 4.
... Erroring on side of terseness rather than
understandability.
<scribe> scribe: Kirk
<scribe> scribenick: Kirk
John: SML references RFC 3986; by XML spec references the predecessor.
<lencharest> Propose changing "as described in the applicable URI RFC" to "as described in the applicable RFC for URI generic syntax".
John: Any objections to proposing the wording in the XLink note.
Resolution: No objections to proposal
John: Recommends that Len talk to Kumar about the change.
Len: Three changes to XLink note: (1) Bug report by Kirk, (2) change XML reference, (3) wording proposal.
John: Any objection to accepting the XLink note with these changes.
RESOLUTION: No objections.
Len: Question: What should be the date on the Notes?
Henry: Use the date of a week on Thursday -- 11 June 2009
John: Kumar has been submitting
these. Len should check with Kumar if he will be available to
submit the document.
... Otherwise, Len will have to learn the process or wait until
Kumar has returned.
s\on\from this
Henry: Date can be in the past by a couple of days (2 or 3 days).
Len and Kirk agree to make the date on the notes 11 June 2009.
John: We don't have a queue of
work. Normal practice is for WG is to remain in existence for
about 6 months. We would stay in existence until around
Thanksgiving.
... One strategy is to schedule call, but cancel if nothing has
come in; or lessen frequency of calls.
... Will not be available during July; in his absence, Henry
will run the meeting.
... Team should consider these ideas for next Monday.
Kirk expresses regrets for next Monday. He will email his comments.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found ScribeNick: Kirk Found Scribe: Kirk Wilson Found Scribe: Kirk Inferring ScribeNick: Kirk Found ScribeNick: Kirk Scribes: Kirk Wilson, Kirk Default Present: Kirk, lencharest, johnarwe_, Sandy, Ht, Ginny_Smith Present: Kirk lencharest johnarwe_ Sandy Ht Ginny_Smith Regrets: Kumar Got date from IRC log name: 01 Jun 2009 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/06/01-sml-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]