IRC log of sml on 2009-06-01
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 16:25:48 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #sml
- 16:25:48 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/06/01-sml-irc
- 16:28:54 [johnarwe_]
- johnarwe_ has joined #sml
- 16:28:58 [lencharest]
- lencharest has joined #sml
- 16:31:37 [Zakim]
- XML_SMLWG()12:30PM has now started
- 16:31:44 [Zakim]
- +Kirk
- 16:32:00 [Zakim]
- +[Microsoft]
- 16:32:18 [lencharest]
- zakim, [Microsoft] is me
- 16:32:18 [Zakim]
- +lencharest; got it
- 16:32:26 [Zakim]
- +johnarwe_
- 16:32:43 [Kirk]
- Kirk has joined #sml
- 16:33:06 [Zakim]
- +Sandy
- 16:33:28 [ht]
- zakim, please call ht-781
- 16:33:28 [Zakim]
- ok, ht; the call is being made
- 16:33:30 [Zakim]
- +Ht
- 16:33:33 [Kirk]
- scribenick: Kirk
- 16:33:44 [Kirk]
- Scribe: Kirk Wilson
- 16:33:57 [Kirk]
- Chair: John Arwe
- 16:34:44 [Kirk]
- meeting: W3C SML Teleconference 1 June 2009
- 16:34:47 [johnarwe_]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2009May/att-0012/20090518-sml-minutes.html
- 16:35:05 [Kirk]
- Regrets: Kumar
- 16:35:34 [Kirk]
- TOPIC: Minutes for May 18
- 16:35:50 [Kirk]
- Minutes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2009May/att-0012/20090518-sml-minutes.html
- 16:36:17 [Kirk]
- Resolution: Approved by unanimous consent.
- 16:36:42 [Kirk]
- TOPIC: No update from CG
- 16:37:12 [Kirk]
- TOPIC: Action Items
- 16:37:35 [Kirk]
- No new Action items
- 16:38:08 [Kirk]
- TOPIC: EPR Note - new comments
- 16:38:23 [Kirk]
- Len: comments are basically editorial
- 16:39:02 [Kirk]
- Kirk: Agrees and is working on them. Still needs to look into the hover problem on "Back to Contents" link.
- 16:39:53 [Kirk]
- RESOLUTION: Consensus that there is no need to review the document once the changes are made.
- 16:40:48 [Kirk]
- TOPIC: XLink Note
- 16:41:20 [Kirk]
- Len: New version is ready to be posted to answer the comment raised by Kirk.
- 16:41:41 [lencharest]
- http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2007/xml/sml/xlink-note.html?rev=1.8&content-type=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1
- 16:41:51 [Kirk]
- Len: Also need to change the wording for the XML reference to match that which in the SML spec.
- 16:42:20 [Kirk]
- Kirk: One minor wording change needs to be made: "this specification" --> "SML specification".
- 16:43:32 [Kirk]
- Len: Question on wording in section 2 item 4.
- 16:44:20 [Kirk]
- ...Erroring on side of terseness rather than understandability.
- 16:44:31 [Kirk]
- scribe: Kirk
- 16:45:08 [Kirk]
- scribenick: Kirk
- 16:46:50 [Kirk]
- John: SML references RFC 3986; by XML spec references the predecessor.
- 16:47:10 [johnarwe_]
- http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2007/xml/sml/xlink-note.html?rev=1.8&content-type=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1#examples
- 16:47:42 [Zakim]
- +Ginny_Smith
- 16:48:05 [lencharest]
- Propose changing "as described in the applicable URI RFC" to "as described in the applicable RFC for URI generic syntax".
- 16:48:09 [ginny_]
- ginny_ has joined #sml
- 16:49:23 [johnarwe_]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 16:49:25 [Kirk]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 16:53:00 [Kirk]
- John: Any objections to proposing the wording in the XLink note.
- 16:53:20 [Kirk]
- Resolution: No objections to proposal
- 16:53:22 [ginny_]
- ginny_ has joined #sml
- 16:53:45 [Kirk]
- John: Recommends that Len talk to Kumar about the change.
- 16:54:26 [Kirk]
- Len: Three changes to XLink note: (1) Bug report by Kirk, (2) change XML reference, (3) wording proposal.
- 16:54:54 [Kirk]
- John: Any objection to accepting the XLink note with these changes.
- 16:55:04 [Kirk]
- RESOLUTION: No objections.
- 16:55:31 [Kirk]
- Len: Question: What should be the date on the Notes?
- 16:56:30 [Kirk]
- Henry: Use the date of a week on Thursday -- 11 June 2009
- 16:57:23 [ginny_]
- ginny_ has joined #sml
- 16:57:26 [Kirk]
- John: Kumar has been submitting these. Len should check with Kumar if he will be available to submit the document.
- 16:58:00 [Kirk]
- ...Otherwise, Len will have to learn the process or wait until Kumar has returned.
- 16:58:32 [Kirk]
- s\on\from this
- 16:59:43 [Kirk]
- Henry: Date can be in the past by a couple of days (2 or 3 days).
- 16:59:58 [Kirk]
- Len and Kirk agree to make the date on the notes 11 June 2009.
- 17:00:25 [Zakim]
- -Sandy
- 17:00:28 [Kirk]
- TOPIC: Roadmap for future work.
- 17:01:22 [ginny_]
- ginny_ has joined #sml
- 17:02:12 [Kirk]
- John: We don't have a queue of work. Normal practice is for WG is to remain in existence for about 6 months. We would stay in existence until around Thanksgiving.
- 17:04:14 [Kirk]
- John: One strategy is to schedule call, but cancel if nothing has come in; or lessen frequency of calls.
- 17:05:10 [Kirk]
- John: Will not be available during July; in his absence, Henry will run the meeting.
- 17:05:56 [Kirk]
- John: Team should consider these ideas for next Monday.
- 17:06:08 [Zakim]
- -lencharest
- 17:06:10 [Zakim]
- -Kirk
- 17:06:11 [Zakim]
- -Ginny_Smith
- 17:06:11 [Zakim]
- -johnarwe_
- 17:06:13 [Zakim]
- -Ht
- 17:06:14 [Zakim]
- XML_SMLWG()12:30PM has ended
- 17:06:15 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Kirk, lencharest, johnarwe_, Sandy, Ht, Ginny_Smith
- 17:06:29 [Kirk]
- Kirk expresses regrets for next Monday. He will email his comments.
- 17:06:45 [johnarwe_]
- johnarwe_ has left #sml
- 17:06:56 [Kirk]
- rrsagent, generate minutes
- 17:06:56 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/06/01-sml-minutes.html Kirk
- 18:31:25 [lencharest]
- lencharest has left #sml
- 18:43:04 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #sml