See also: IRC log
<Jan> Chair: Jan
<Jan> Scribe: Greg
Call out sections that are new or changed
<Jan> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2009/ED-ATAG20-20090512/
Options are accept, change prior to release as public working draft
<Jan> Authoring tools are just one aspect of Web accessibility....
<jtrevir> First changes to introduction. 3rd note under first paragraph.
<Jan> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2009/ED-ATAG20-20090512/
<jeanne> +1 accept
<jtrevir> No objections accepted.
Note 3 in Introduction "Authoring tools are just one aspect of accessibility... ACCEPTED
<Jan> All: Accept new org. of componetnst of accessibility.
<jtrevir> 2nd: Change to notes in definition, range of tools ATAG replies to. In response to Greg's comments.
Change to notes in Definition "ATAG 2.0 applies to a wide variety..."
<Jan> GP: Meets my concerns
<jeanne> +1 acce[t
<Jan> All: Accept wording of range of authoring tools
<jtrevir> 3rd: layers of guidance, adapted from WCAG.
ATAG 2.0 Layers of Guidance Replaces Organization of the Document
<Jan> All: Accept "layers of guidance"
Editor's note can be removed
<jtrevir> Reference to WCAG 1.0 removed.
<jtrevir> First bullet revised.
<Jan> GP: Wonder about third bullet...
<jtrevir> GP: evidence of conformance requiring content is a concern
<jtrevir> Should this section be normative or informative?
<jtrevir> GP: May not be possible to provide content in a conformance claim
<jtrevir> JR: is the 3rd bullet required?
<jtrevir> Jeanne: It should be removed, as it is inconsistent.
<Jan> ACTION: jeanne to Remove •ATAG 2.0 Conformance Claims are to be supported by examples of Web content produced by the authoring tool (e.g., samples of automatically-generated content) that conform to WCAG 2.0. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/18-au-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-145 - Remove •ATAG 2.0 Conformance Claims are to be supported by examples of Web content produced by the authoring tool (e.g., samples of automatically-generated content) that conform to WCAG 2.0. [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-05-25].
<jtrevir> JR: any other objection?
<Jan> All: No other objections to rewording of "Relationship to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0"
<jtrevir> All: section is normative.
<Jan> Resolved: Add "This section is normative." to Relationship to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0" section
<jtrevir> To be explicitly noted with section.
<Jan> Resolved: "Integration of Accessibility Features " and "ATAG 2.0 Layers of Guidance" remain infromative
<jtrevir> GP: B .1.3.1 Priority level not noted.
<Jan> ACTION: jeanne to B.3.1.1 add Level [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/18-au-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-146 - B.3.1.1 add Level [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-05-25].
<jtrevir> GP: There are two B.2.4.4s
<Jan> ACTION: jeanne to B.2.4.4 to B.2.4.5 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/18-au-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-147 - B.2.4.4 to B.2.4.5 [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-05-25].
<jtrevir> GP: Have created analysis of success criteria for editors draft.
<jtrevir> GP: with a breakdown of priority levels. Created as indicator of effort required for task of compliance.
<jtrevir> GP: will send it along to working group.
<jtrevir> JR: Was broken down into 3 levels of compliance.
<Jan> http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#new-terms
<jtrevir> Referencing WCAG 2.0
<jtrevir> WCAG does not break the definition of accessible technologies into levels.
<jtrevir> GP: Automatically selected for what?
<Jan> ACTION: jeanne to Label B.1.1 for F2F discussion [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/18-au-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-148 - Label B.1.1 for F2F discussion [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-05-25].
B.1.1.1 for further discussion at face to face
<Jan> ↑In order to ensure that the process of using ATAG 2.0 and WCAG 2.0 together in the development of authoring tools is as simple as possible
<Jan> ...
<jtrevir> JR: this is informative, suggest it be moved to an appendix.
<jtrevir> editorial changes and grammar edits required.
<Jan> JR: cannot make content accessible↑ => cannot make the authoring tool user interface accessible
<Jan> JR: 4th bullet: Success Criteria => Success Criterion
<jtrevir> Jeanne: Should this be in the introduction? Do not want it in an appendix, it will be ignored.
<jtrevir> Andrew, Greg and Jutta: should stay in.
<Andrew> My Skype just dropped out but i would agree with Jeanne
<jtrevir> JR: Suggested title: Understanding ATAG Conformance Levels
<jtrevir> JR: Move to last section of Introduction as informative section.
<Jan> ACTION: jeanne to Move the section on setting Conformance Levels to the a new last sub-scetion in the Introduction [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/05/18-au-minutes.html#action05]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-149 - Move the section on setting Conformance Levels to the a new last sub-scetion in the Introduction [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-05-25].
<Jan> First para: ↑In order to ensure that the process
<Jan> ....might place on developers)
<Jan> DELETE: ↑Conformance Levels in Conformance Claims
<Jan> Andrew: Yes
<jtrevir> Greg: Yes
<jtrevir> Jeanne: Yes
<jtrevir> SueAnn: Yes
<jtrevir> Jutta: Yes
<jtrevir> Jan: Yes
<jtrevir> JR: will clean up draft and publish late this week.
<jtrevir> Next Week memorial day
<jtrevir> Will meet in 2 weeks time.
<jtrevir> 10 days from face to face
<jtrevir> 2 meetings in June before F2F
<jtrevir> SEnd any concerns before Last Call draft.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: Greg Inferring ScribeNick: Greg Default Present: Jeanne, Jan, Andrew, JuttaT, Greg_Pisocky, +1.561.582.aaaa, SueAnn Present: Jeanne Jan Andrew JuttaT Greg_Pisocky +1.561.582.aaaa SueAnn Regrets: Tim_B. Ann_M. Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2009AprJun/0036.html Got date from IRC log name: 18 May 2009 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/05/18-au-minutes.html People with action items: jeanne WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]