SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference

12 May 2009


See also: IRC log






<trackbot> Date: 12 May 2009

CR Transition

Roland: in need of some implementations of the standard, so we can get a set of results.

Phil: Do we need two versions interoperating?
... implementation in websphere - if we can construct a set of tests that meets the test case documents that we currently have - and output that things look like they should - is it sufficient for a single implementation to show that.

Roland: We need two implementation, at least.


Roland: Need two implementations of *each* feature. For example, WSDL 1.1 needs two independent implementations. Likewise for WSDL 2.0.
... Point is to say that it is possible to implement the spec.

Expected date for the end of CR - End of August.

scribe: any other code around that validates the specification?

eric: DIfficult to commit on TIBCO's part to an implementation by August, but existence of the CR version will certainly change where we're at over the next few months.

Roland: After eric's email to IETF, looks like we're all set there?

Eric: Need to submit a new draft to the IETF, one additional introductory paragraph
... and an extra sentence.

Roland: any timeline on when we'll get the revision done?

eric: Endeavor to get changes done by end of business Wed., PST.

Roland: Will try to get the CR spec rev'd to point to the 06 draft.


Roland: Went through and did cleanup of assertion text.
... why don't we go through actions.

<Roland> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/pendingreview

Roland: Worked on action 84.

<Roland> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#assertionsummary

Roland: Looked at assertion 2042, and since it was just a table pulling together faults from elsewhere, we don't need an assertion at the end.
... any one have a problem with actions 84 & 85?

close action-84

<trackbot> ACTION-84 Reword the assertions 2035, 2039, and 2041 so that they make more sense closed

close action-85

<trackbot> ACTION-85 See whether assertion 2042 can be removed bacause all faults are covered by their own assertion closed

Phil: Did you redo the test generation?

Roland: Failed to get that to work.

Phil: OK - I'll regenerate.

<Roland> http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/assertions/assertions.html

Roland: Back to testing doc.
... Changes made to content type still need to be addressed.
... Others are the WSDL bits.

(no comment)

Roland: By far the majority of the test cases have assertions.
... Action for everyone to take a look at the test assertion document - see if you can figure out how to fill in the gaps.

Phil: Regenerated test cases.

Roland: Need remaining assertions, and and code to execute them....


Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.135 (CVS log)
$Date: 2009/05/12 16:35:43 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/Derek/Phil/
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: eric
Inferring Scribes: eric

WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: Phil Roland eric joined soap-jms trackbot
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy

Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009May/0006.html
Found Date: 12 May 2009
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-soap-jms-minutes.html
People with action items: 

[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]