16:04:28 RRSAgent has joined #soap-jms 16:04:28 logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-soap-jms-irc 16:04:30 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:04:30 Zakim has joined #soap-jms 16:04:32 Zakim, this will be SJMS 16:04:32 ok, trackbot; I see WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM scheduled to start 4 minutes ago 16:04:33 Meeting: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference 16:04:33 Date: 12 May 2009 16:05:01 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009May/0006.html 16:05:06 Chair: Roland 16:08:02 Topic: CR Transition 16:09:45 eric has joined #soap-jms 16:10:23 Roland: in need of some implementations of the standard, so we can get a set of results. 16:10:59 Derek: Do we need two versions interoperating? 16:11:57 ... implementation in websphere - if we can construct a set of tests that meets the test case documents that we currently have - and output that things look like they should - is it sufficient for a single implementation to show that. 16:12:06 Roland: We need two implementation, at least. 16:12:19 s/Derek/Phil/ 16:12:33 (sorry) 16:13:27 Roland: Need two implementations of *each* feature. For example, WSDL 1.1 needs two independent implementations. Likewise for WSDL 2.0. 16:13:36 ... Point is to say that it is possible to implement the spec. 16:14:10 Expected date for the end of CR - End of August. 16:14:45 ... any other code around that validates the specification? 16:17:15 eric: DIfficult to commit on TIBCO's part to an implementation by August, but existence of the CR version will certainly change where we're at over the next few months. 16:18:59 Roland: After eric's email to IETF, looks like we're all set there? 16:19:14 Eric: Need to submit a new draft to the IETF, one additional introductory paragraph 16:19:20 ... and an extra sentence. 16:20:09 Roland: any timeline on when we'll get the revision done? 16:20:26 eric: Endeavor to get changes done by end of business Wed., PST. 16:20:49 Roland: Will try to get the CR spec rev'd to point to the 06 draft. 16:20:59 Topic: Testing 16:21:19 Roland: Went through and did cleanup of assertion text. 16:21:27 ... why don't we go through actions. 16:21:38 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/pendingreview 16:22:25 Roland: Worked on action 84. 16:22:28 http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#assertionsummary 16:24:36 Roland: Looked at assertion 2042, and since it was just a table pulling together faults from elsewhere, we don't need an assertion at the end. 16:24:49 ... any one have a problem with actions 84 & 85? 16:24:53 close action-84 16:24:53 ACTION-84 Reword the assertions 2035, 2039, and 2041 so that they make more sense closed 16:25:00 close action-85 16:25:00 ACTION-85 See whether assertion 2042 can be removed bacause all faults are covered by their own assertion closed 16:25:17 Phil: Did you redo the test generation? 16:25:28 Roland: Failed to get that to work. 16:25:38 Phil: OK - I'll regenerate. 16:26:12 http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/assertions/assertions.html 16:26:17 Roland: Back to testing doc. 16:26:52 ... Changes made to content type still need to be addressed. 16:27:06 ... Others are the WSDL bits. 16:27:09 (no comment) 16:27:36 Roland: By far the majority of the test cases have assertions. 16:28:28 ... Action for everyone to take a look at the test assertion document - see if you can figure out how to fill in the gaps. 16:28:52 Phil: Regenerated test cases. 16:30:31 Roland: Need remaining assertions, and and code to execute them.... 16:30:39 Topic: AOB? 16:35:37 rrsagent, make minutes 16:35:37 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-soap-jms-minutes.html Roland 16:35:47 rrsagent, make log public 16:37:18 eric has left #soap-jms 17:45:19 zakim, please part 17:45:19 Zakim has left #soap-jms 17:45:30 rrsagent, please part 17:45:30 I see no action items