See also: IRC log, previous 2009-03-24
RESOLVED to accept http://www.w3.org/2009/03/24-swd-minutes.html minutes of 24-March telecon
RESOLVED next telecon 21 April, Guus to scribe
Tom: I noted a couple of issues in SKOS
Reference
... do we have enough folk here to discuss these?
Antoine: I think this is a matter of
omission
... when I first looked at it I thought it could be handled by the semantics
of the core properties and the dumbing-down rules
... I don't think we ever thought the semantics would be different
Ralph: I think we should make the change and note it was an error of omission
Guus: agree
Tom: issue 189 is still
open
... I think we resolved to close it
Antoine: it should be in the minutes of the
previous meeting
... but I do not see it mentioned there; we overlooked it
... can we decide it right now?
<Antoine> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Mar/0059.html
Antoine: we did not receive negative feedback from Magnus
PROPOSED: close issue 189
[no objections]
RESOLUTION: issue 189 closed
Tom: issue 191 is still
open
... Alistair has proposed to close -> 2009Mar/0039
[2009-03-14]
Tom: Addison accepted the proposed prose
... so message
37 can be the basis for closing issue 191
Ralph: that was my feeling when I made the case for publishing CR
RESOLUTION: issue 191 closed citing http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Mar/0037.html
Tom: note that issue 192 is raised
-> issue 192; CR Comment: missing bracket in example 44
Tom: Antoine proposed in [2009Mar/0012]
changes to labels and definitions in the RDF file
... Whom to list as dct:contributor (SWAD-Europe, SWBPD, SWD,
public-esw-thes)?
... I'd posted a long message [2009Apr/0009]
on the content, titles, and status of the HTML representations
... I suggest we skip discussion of this until Alistair and Sean are
present
... also question of OWL 1 DL prune of SKOS Ontology:
... -> 2009Mar/0071
[Sean 25 March]
... -> 2009Apr/0004
[Alistair 3 April]
... I suggest we postpone this discussion as well
ACTION: [CONTINUES] Antoine add the Vrieje Uni tool to the implementation report [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/24-swd-minutes.html#action08]
ACTION: [DONE] Alistair to write draft message call for implementations and issue to the list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/03/24-swd-minutes.html#action04]
-> draft email: Call for Implementations: SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System [Alistair 2009-03-24]
<Antoine> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/DisseminationLists
Tom: do we know what lists this message should
be sent to?
... we should send it today
Antoine: I'm willing to send but I think we
should change the date; 15 April is now too soon
... would 2 more weeks be compatible with our timeline?
... that would be a minimum, though personally I'd prefer more time
Tom: how about 30 April, matching our CR end
ACTION: Antoine send call for implementations to the lists identified in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/DisseminationLists with the date changed to 30 April [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/04/07-swd-minutes.html#action03]
Tom: I noted that the legacy SKOS Core documents could usefully have forward links to the new specification
-- http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-skos-core-spec/ - DONE
-- http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-skos-core-guide/ - DONE
-- http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-thesaurus-pubguide/
- see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jun/0079.html
-- http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/mapping/spec/2004-11-11.html
Tom: I suggest that Antoine could create a single page pointing readers forward to the new SKOS Primer
Antoine: the Best Practices as well
Tom: yes
RESOLUTION: create intermediate pages for the legacy SKOS Core documents referring readers to the new specifications
ACTION: Antoine draft intermediate pages for the legacy SKOS Core documents referring readers to the new specifications [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/04/07-swd-minutes.html#action04]
Tom: on the mapping vocabulary specification, we could use a page similar to the one for swbp-skos-core-spec
Antoine: sounds reasonable, I'll include it in my action
ACTION: Antoine draft intermediate pages for http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/mapping/spec/2004-11-11.html referring readers to the new specifications [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/04/07-swd-minutes.html#action05]
ACTION: [CONTINUES] Ben review RDFa Use Cases and propose transition to Group Note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-swd-minutes.html#action02]
ACTION: [CONTINUES] Ralph to review the revised Recipes draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/12/02-swd-minutes.html#action15]
ACTION: [CONTINUES] Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20]
ACTION: [DONE] Diego to prepare new version of recipes note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/03/24-swd-minutes.html#action07]
<berrueta_> new Recipes draft
Diego: I send the new Recipes draft
... also I opened a new tracker issue
... issue 193
-> issue 193; HTML served to browser even when RDF is explicitely requested in the Accept header
Tom: we'll discuss this new draft at a future meeting
ACTION: [CONTINUES] Ralph post his comments on the editor's draft of the metadata note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/25-swd-minutes.html#action03]
ACTION: [DONE] Guus to draft response to ian with thanks for addressing comments, happy to see revised documents, would favour new features document also to include rdf syntax [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/03/24-swd-minutes.html#action11]
-> Re: [LC response] To SWD WG [Guus 2009-04-07]
Tom: -> Request
for WAI-ARIA review, Accessible Rich Internet Applications 1.0, Last
Call
... I don't think we have enough resources in the WG to formally do this
... but if anyone has the time individually, please feel free
... comment deadline is 17 April
... do we need to send a formal reply?
Ralph: yes, please send what you just said
Tom: OK, I'll reply to Michael Cooper and CC the WG list
[adjourned]