ISSUE-135: Review transforms for XML Encryption 1.1 and alignment with Signature 1.1

Review transforms for XML Encryption 1.1 and alignment with Signature 1.1

State:
CLOSED
Product:
XML Encryption 1.1
Raised by:
Frederick Hirsch
Opened on:
2009-06-09
Description:
Related Actions Items:
Related emails:
  1. Re: Minutes 06 Oct 2009 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-10-08)
  2. Minutes 06 Oct 2009 (from Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM on 2009-10-06)
  3. Re: Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-10-06 (from Konrad.Lanz@iaik.tugraz.at on 2009-10-06)
  4. Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-10-06 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-10-02)
  5. Proposal - no change needed to XML Encryption to add Transforms to algorithm section (ISSUE-135) (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-10-02)
  6. Re: Sept 29 Meeting Minutes (from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-09-29)
  7. Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-09-29 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-09-28)
  8. Re: Transforms for XML Encryption - propose to close ISSUE-135 (from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-09-28)
  9. Transforms for XML Encryption - propose to close ISSUE-135 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-09-28)
  10. approved minutes from 9 June 2009 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-06-16)
  11. updated minutes for review, approval today (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-06-16)

Related notes:

Raised during June 2009 F2F on topic of aligning 1.1 XML Signature and XML Encryption

From minutes:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec/2009Jun/att-0009/09-xmlsec-minutes.html#item07

<fjh> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/Overview.htm#sec-CipherReference
Magnus: nothing in particular in mind
... we don't have a transform element , should there be one?
<fjh> "The syntax of the URI and Transforms is similar to that of"
Frederick: may need to review this more
<fjh> issue: review transforms for encryption
<trackbot> Created ISSUE-135 - Review transforms for encryption ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/135/edit .

Mail from Magnus stated:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009May/0054.html

- XMLEnc does not mention transform algorithms (but should probably given
the CipherReference type, see XMLEnc Section 3.3.1). If the group
agrees that it should, I guess the same normative statements as are in
XMLDsig 1.1 with regards to transforms should apply?

Frederick Hirsch, 1 Oct 2009, 21:58:18

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 135.html,v 1.1 2017/01/10 16:24:42 carine Exp $