See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 11 September 2008
<shepazu> http://schepers.cc/?p=71
AG: finished generating
references, and made fixes
... some of the animation tests revision numbers don't
match
... all the ones I checked have matching revision numbers, but
the ones I haven't checked I'm not sure about
ED: how many are left to check?
AG: ~190 tests to check
ED: if the reference and the testcase pass criteria don't match, which is the true pass criteria?
AG: testsuite doesn't say currently
DS: we can publish the testsuite, and come back and change the mismatches in the coming weeks
<anthony> fonts-desc-03-t.svg
<anthony> fonts-desc-05-t.svg
AG: came across two tests
(above)
... they're font-matching tests
... both have status="accepted" but are not approved yet
... from svg basic 1.1
... bitflash and opera pass fonts-desc-03-t.svg
... bitflash passes the 05 as well
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/fonts-desc-03-t.svg
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/fonts-desc-05-t.svg
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-svg-wg/2007JanMar/0260.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-svg-wg/2006AprJun/0648.html
ED: we'll come back to these for the next release we make of the testsuite
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-201-t.svg?sortby=file
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-201-t.svg
AG: will choose a smaller
fontsize and regenerate
... so we'll go ahead and publish, some of the references will
have mismatching revision numbers
NH: can I help out?
AG: checking references against
each test is useful, but we can do it after the
publication
... would be good
NH: when is the publication?
AG: asap
... will contact CL to push it out
DS: made changes to the spec in
the past few days, please check them
... most from actions
... put in criteria for search-engines
... hopefully useful for search-engines...
... still working on dom 3 events -> udom, should be done
later today
... then I need to put the highlevel view of the changes
... and making it pubrules compliant
... CL and me are probably the only ones to have spec-editing
actions left
... made some notes about what might be broken in the
schema
... that's something that can be fixed while we're in LC
... finishing up title and desc, changelog and
dom3events...those are the only things holding up the
publication
<shepazu> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008JulSep/0262.html
DS: we had agreed to add @rel and
@rev to svgt12
... spoke to some microformat people, and there are some
attributes missing for rdfa
... this along with ARIA will allow svg to be processed in more
interesting ways
... added the 9 attributes and 'role'
... only requirement is to put them into the DOM
AE: if it's XML then it'll be in the dom, no additional impl. burden
NH: i agree
DS: ok
... so AE did you do the action for
'static'/bufferedrendering
AE: yes
DS: is a good addition to svg
NH: agree
AG: did you check revision numbers on the ones you checked?
AE: most of them yes, converted
most to use svg patchfiles
... some of the media-anim ones are wrong, because it wasn't
supported in batik
... I could go through and make mockups for those
ED: think we should do that after
publication yes
... svgpatchfiles are much simpler to handle than the png
ones
AG: ok, will send out an email and we can go through the ones that we have to fix up
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008JulSep/0246.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008JulSep/0247.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008JulSep/0249.html
DS: curious about deployment
patterns
... content on mobiles is a bit dynamic, right? because of
sandboxing
NH: we have different mobile and
tv solutions, so there are different players out there
... may be a problem if the content is using the old way of
accessing the content
DS: could you deploy it as having both?
NH: yes
ED: or simply ask them to change the content
DS: this is the reason we want to
change it: it'll ease our transition to the next phase
... will help people making content, to move content out on the
web as browsers see it
... the impact on your impl. is probably smaller than if we
wait and try to do it later
NH: will get back to you in two hours or so
ED: it's mostly about changing the name, the functionality will still be there
NH: right, will research how it
would affect us
... some solutions use an svgplayer and then have a bunch of
svgfiles and scripts
... others package svgfiles with the player that isn't
dynamically updated
... some use dynamic updates from a server
RESOLUTION: we will remove SVGDocument.global and replace it with defaultView from DOM 2 Views
<scribe> ACTION: ed to remove SVGDocument.global replacing it with defaultView in the 1.2T spec [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-svg-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2190 - Remove SVGDocument.global replacing it with defaultView in the 1.2T spec [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-09-18].
trackbot, make minutes
<trackbot> Sorry, ed, I don't understand 'trackbot, make minutes'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133 of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: ed Inferring Scribes: ed Default Present: Andrew_Sledd, Doug_Schepers, anthony, aemmons Present: Andrew_Sledd Doug_Schepers anthony aemmons WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 11 Sep 2008 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2008/09/11-svg-minutes.html People with action items: ed[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]
