W3C

- DRAFT -

XML Processing Model WG

14 Aug 2008

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Norm, Paul, Henry, Vojtech, Andrew, Richard
Regrets
Murray, Alex
Chair
Norm
Scribe
Norm

Contents


 

Date: 14 Aug 2008

<scribe> Meeting: 122

<scribe> Scribe: Norm

<scribe> ScribeNick: Norm

-> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/WD-xproc-20080814/

Accept this agenda?

-> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2008/08/14-agenda

Accepted

Accept minutes from the previous meeting?

-> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2008/08/07-minutes

Accepted

Next meeting: telcon 21 Aug 2008?

Norm: We may cancel it, but we'll leave it on the books. No regrets heard.

Charter extension

Norm: Is that something I do, or Henry, do you do it?

<scribe> ACTION: Henry to investigate the charter extension process [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/14-xproc-minutes.html#action01]

Comments on the last call draft

-> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/WD-xproc-20080814/

No comments heard.

<scribe> ACTION: Henry to update the XSD and DTD files then give Julian the green light to publish [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/14-xproc-minutes.html#action02]

Test suite planning

Norm looks for help and advice in constructing an adequate test suite on the assumption we'll make it through Last Call and get to CR easily.

Norm: There are already about 80 or so at tests.xproc.org

Henry: What's the metadata you need?

Norm: There's documentation for the test format at tests.xproc.org, but I'm happy to adjust it as necessary.
... We will stall if we don't get a test suite...

Henry: My metadata question was about coverage. We need to give some thought to the metadata to describe *what features* are tested.
... We need to be able to characterize the tests to make the interoperability claim have some teeth.

Norm: I was going to analyze the test suite for missing steps and missing options on steps.

Henry: That's a good start, but there are also questions about the topology of the pipeline and the inheritence of variables and defaulting of pipes, etc.
... Those aren't as easy to enumerate.

Norm: I was also hoping to have tests for every static and dynamic error as well, that covers many of those things.

Richard: The XML test suite doesn't attempt to identify the "correct" error and this has sometimes caused problems.

Henry: Having explicit error codes helps a little bit.

Norm: Metadata is a good idea, maybe we should have some email discussiona bout how to devise metadata that covers the spec.

Any other business?

Vojtech: Regarding error codes, right now we have gaps in the numbering. Is that ok?

Norm: I think it is. We talkeda bout it once before and decided that the cost was larger than the benefit.

Vojtech/Henry: I'm ok with that.

Adjourned.

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: Henry to investigate the charter extension process [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/14-xproc-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: Henry to update the XSD and DTD files then give Julian the green light to publish [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/14-xproc-minutes.html#action02]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.133 (CVS log)
$Date: 2008/08/14 15:25:20 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133  of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: Norm
Inferring ScribeNick: Norm
Found ScribeNick: Norm
Default Present: Norm, PGrosso, ht, +1.734.352.aaaa, richard, Vojtech, AndrewF
Present: Norm Paul Henry Vojtech Andrew Richard
Regrets: Murray Alex
Agenda: http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2008/08/14-agenda
Found Date: 14 Aug 2008
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2008/08/14-xproc-minutes.html
People with action items: henry

[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]