See also: IRC log, previous 2008-07-29
RESOLVED to accept minutes of last telecon
Ben: the implementation test suite is complete
now
... 2 implementation pass the test
... the implementation report is going ok
... They were a couple of comments on Syntax and Primer
... but none of these imply big changes, more editorial changes
... The issues are in the tracker
<JeremyCarroll> Yes
Ben: we want to provide the documents for next
meeting (in 2 weeks)
... we weren't sure whether we need a full review for that
... as there won't be significant changes
Tom: since the changes are editorial, reviewers
should not think as thoroughly,
... rather double-check that the task force has answered to the comments
... It would be good to have reviewers' input
... on the examples that had to be rewritten
... Diego, Ed, are you ok with that?
Diego, Ed: we're happy to do this!
Ben: let's aim at giving you documents and list of issues in two week times
Tom: which documents?
Ben: the only thing that is normative is the
Syntax
... I can propose the Implementation Reports as well
... the Primer will be changed, but just some notes
Tom: so the two documents for the reviewers are
Syntax and Implementation report.
... expected date?
Ben: 19th August
... for the documents to be available.
... If the changes are minor, would e-mail exchange be acceptable?
... I cannot promise earlier
Tom: my preference would be for having a call,
I'll check with Guus
... maybe a decision can be made for Aug 26
Jemery: what is Alan's take on this?
Ben: we have not yet answered all his points
... believe that it is most editorial
Jeremy: there should be agreement on that
Ben: yes
<JeremyCarroll> A meeting would be necessary if a commentator is not happy.
ACTION: Ben to prepare draft implementation report for RDFa (with assistance from Michael) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] [CONTINUES]
Tom: we need to set the Last Call period
... and plan for finalizing for the SKOS Primer
<seanb> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20080730/Overview.html
Tom: what is the status of the Reference for internal review?
Sean: Guus is reviewing the quoted document this week
Margherita: I agree to be a second reviewer
Tom: we have a pending issue that need to be
resolved
... before we can approve the Last Call.
... Sean, is ISSUE-83 and proposed solution in the draft?
Sean: yes
ACTION: Ed to investigate what text could be added to primer re. concept co-ordination [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/22-swd-minutes.html#action02] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Guus to write primer text re: broaderGeneric and equivalence w/r/t subclass [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action08] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Alistair to update the history page adding direct link to latest version of rdf triple [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/17-swd-minutes.html#action01] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: SKOS Reference Editors to specifically flag features at risk for Last Call. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/24-swd-minutes.html#action17] [DONE]
Sean: that's done in the latest draft
ACTION: Sean to post comment to OWL WG re annotation requirements. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/24-swd-minutes.html#action06] [DONE]
see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jul/0083.html
ACTION: Alistair to open issue relating to topConceptOf and propose a resolution. [recorded in [36]http://www.w3.org/2008/07/29-swd-minutes.html#action12] [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/05-swd-minutes.html#action08]
see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jul/0080.html
Tom: I'd suggest we vote on it now
Sean: agreed
Tom: is there any discussion?
RESOLVED to accept http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jul/0080.html as a resolution to ISSUE-123
ACTION: Antoine and Ed to add content to Primer about irreflexivity [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/06-swd-minutes.html#action06] [DONE]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jun/0094.html
Ed: should XL be in the Primer?
Antoine: there should be some notes mentioning it and clarifying its use
<TomB> +1 agree on adding XL to Primer
ACTION: Ed to write a note on SKOS-XL in the Primer [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/05-swd-minutes.html#action10]
Ed: about the coordination issue I'm not completely sure on how to address that
Tom: what do you think we might do with it
... in terms of a small but perhaps useful note?
Diego: two choices: let the wiki page as such or try to write a doc
Tom: my preference would be to write it as a
note
... and make some WG decision to publish that.
... Not anything more expansive than what we have on the wiki
... Would you agree to become the editor of such note?
Diego: Yes
... Maybe next week I can have the very same info as on wiki reformated as a
document
Ed: I'd be interested at looking over it
ACTION: Diego to put the Wiki page on RDFa metadata in a Note form [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/05-swd-minutes.html#action11]
ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Jon and Ralph to publish Recipes as Working Group Note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/10-swd-minutes.html#action03] [CONTINUES]
Tom: I propose that we conclude for today
Change Log:
$Log: 05-swd-minutes.html,v $Revision 1.5 2008/08/19 15:08:02 swickCorrect issue number; 83 -> 123, per 2008-08-19 telecon. A bit of cleanup.
Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.133 (CVS log)
$Date: 2008/08/19 15:08:02 $