See also: IRC log
<Charlie> * hi nick, keith
<Charlie> * hi zakim
<nick> Regrets so far: Steven, Erik, John, Leigh
+ Uli
Hi
<wellsk> I do not hear anything -- wondering if I am having trouble?
<nick> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008May/0004.html
<nick> Scribe: Roger
<Charlie> keith, can you hear now?
<wellsk> nope
<wellsk> hanging up and redialing
<nick> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0118.html
<nick> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/att-0132/2008-04-30.html#topic9
<Roger_> Nick: Do somebody want to add sth
Charlie: Maybe we need more stuff but we are very close
<nick> Nick: Are there CSS specialists, or people who know how toe solve the styling issue
<Roger_> Nick: I will send a mail to the list
<Roger_> Nick: Reading the spec there were a problem with the event-handlers
<nick> Nick: We can add the current value that is invalid to the context info of the xforms-invalid event
<nick> Nick: We will postpone the discussion about CSS till a later call
<nick> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0100.html
<nick> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/att-0104/2008-04-23.html#topic7
<Roger_> Nick: an email I sent
<Roger_> Nick: related an action item for me
<nick> http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms11/#expr-dependencies
<Roger_> Nick: in the spec the first b is the only dependent node
<Roger_> Nick: to be considered
<Roger_> http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms11/#expr-dependencies
<Roger_> Nick: my question was how many a or bs should be in the dependency list
<Roger_> Nick: according the spec only the first b should it be
<Roger_> Roger: In Madrid we didn�t study this case
<Roger_> Nick: Probably we need to postpone, or maybe there is not better solution
<Roger_> Charlie: Maybe you can close the action Item
<Roger_> Charlie: You can arise a new action item
<Roger_> Nick: we�d need some good candidate to study the dependency problem in detail
<Roger_> Nick: just leave in the agenda
<nick> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0127.html
<nick> http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms11/#insert-delete-patterns-set-attribute
<Roger_> Nick: I think the sample is wrong
<Roger_> Nick: we�d need to change the sample
<wellsk> [me] +1
<Roger_> ACTION: John needs to fix the insert sample B4, adding a note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-forms-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot-ng> Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - John
<trackbot-ng> Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. jkugelma, jboyer)
<nick> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2008Apr/0003.html
<nick> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_Future_Features
<Roger_> Nick: we have to clarify the Mozilla implementation
<nick> Nick: value attribute is evaluated relative to the bind attribute on the setvalue
<Roger_> ACTION: Nick to respond the email 2008Apr/003 saying that is a future issue [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-forms-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-459 - Respond the email 2008Apr/003 saying that is a future issue [on Nick Van Den Bleeken - due 2008-05-14].
<nick> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0115.html
<Roger_> Charlie: Have we relaxed the rules for allowing the model?
<Roger_> Charlie: do we know the html requirements?
<nick> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/mod-xforms.html#s_xformsmodule
<Roger_> Nick: ... m12n
<Roger_> Nick: I think I can live with the one container issue
<Roger_> Nick: maybe we can add some module for this in xforms and not in the Core
<Roger_> Charlie: we should think in adding it in a separate module
<Roger_> Nick: John & MBibeck are strong supporters for the form tag
<wellsk> yes
<Roger_> +1
<Roger_> RESOLUTION: Add container element called "form" to xforms language
<nick> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0063.html
<Roger_> Nick: John proposed to use the action attr
<Roger_> Nick: if you have an form with action and method we can create a default submission
<Roger_> Nick: .. we need a support for nested models
<Roger_> Nick: but nested models it could be a 2.O issue
<Roger_> Charlie: form tag is more a container tag
<Roger_> Nick: .. for instance if you decide to type a element it creates a bind
<Roger_> Nick: the implied submission could point to the default model but if you have a model you couldn�t refer to it
<Roger_> Nick: I will look out the stuff I wrote
<Roger_> Nick: ... we can discuss further on it
<Roger_> Charlie: Backplane is starting next Friday
<nick> actions?
<Roger_> Bye
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133 of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/John needs to fix the sample/John needs to fix the insert sample B4/ Succeeded: s/one/the one/ Found Scribe: Roger Inferring ScribeNick: Roger Default Present: Charlie, Nick_van_den_Bleeken, wellsk, Rafael Present: Charlie Nick_van_den_Bleeken wellsk Rafael Regrets: Steven Erik_(possible) John Leigh Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008May/0004.html Got date from IRC log name: 07 May 2008 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-forms-minutes.html People with action items: john needs nick WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]