<John_Boyer> Scribe: Leigh

<John_Boyer> scribenick: Leigh_Klotz

<John_Boyer> agenda link http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0076.html

<nick> hmm, I have forgotten to add the actions from last week I guess

<John_Boyer> Erik's email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0077.html

<John_Boyer> MarkB's email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0079.html

<nick> target-node ;)

<Charlie> ref would seem to imply a binding behavior

<Charlie> but i guess we already do that on setvalue

<klotz> cf. upload/filename and upload/mediatype

<nick> value is never a ref

<nick> why not keep target as attribute, but also allow target child, and say that if replace is instance or text it should be an xpath expression

<nick> then we can use target attribute for repelaece all

<John_Boyer> because target attribute makes no sense for replace instance.

<nick> and there is no need to invent another name

<John_Boyer> in all cases where we have a matching attr and child elem, they get at the same thing

<klotz> <submission><resource>http://foo</resource></submission>

<klotz> <submission><resource>http://foo</resource></submission>

<klotz> <submission><resource value="abc" /></submission>

<Rafael> Sorry to be so late

<Charlie> are we sure that's required?

<John_Boyer> Are we resolved to take 1.1 to a short LC to rename the functionality currently known as submission/@target?

<klotz> RESOLUTION: We resolve to rename submission/@target for XForms 1.1

<Steven> +1

<klotz> <response ref="...">?

<nick> I think it iss a bit confusing

<nick> Ok lets keep it target then

<klotz> <replace ref="..." />

<nick> minutes is fine

<klotz> ACTION: Steven Pemberton to propose name for submission attribute or child element to replace submssion/@target [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/16-forms-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-456 - Pemberton to propose name for submission attribute or child element to replace submssion/@target [on Steven Pemberton - due 2008-04-23].

<klotz> ACTION: Leigh Klotz to propose a last-call comment to group in response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0001.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/16-forms-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-457 - Klotz to propose a last-call comment to group in response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0001.html [on Leigh Klotz, Jr. - due 2008-04-23].

<John_Boyer> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0068.html

<nick> Does this include form, fieldset, button, option,..?

<nick> So we are not talking about incorporating those element names in the XForms language but only defining a mapping?

<ebruchez> I have to leave now, talk to you next week.

<Roger> bye

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133  of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/matcing/matching/
Succeeded: s/1../1.1/
Found Scribe: Leigh
Found ScribeNick: Leigh_Klotz
WARNING: No scribe lines found matching ScribeNick pattern: <Leigh_Klotz> ...

WARNING: 0 scribe lines found (out of 130 total lines.)
Are you sure you specified a correct ScribeNick?


WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.

Default Present: Charlie, Nick_van_den_Bleeken, John_Boyer, wellsk, Steven, [IPcaller], ebruchez, Leigh_Klotz, Susan_Borgrink, markbirbeck, Rafael
Present: Charlie Nick_van_den_Bleeken John_Boyer wellsk Steven [IPcaller] ebruchez Leigh_Klotz Susan_Borgrink markbirbeck Rafael
Regrets: Uli
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0076.html
Got date from IRC log name: 16 Apr 2008
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2008/04/16-forms-minutes.html
People with action items: klotz leigh pemberton steven

WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report