See also: IRC log
<John_Boyer> Scribe: Leigh
<Roger> Rafael also sent Regrets.
hi uli
<unl> hi
oh
<Steven> Happy recent birthday to Sebastian!
<NickVdB> ack, me
<John_Boyer> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Nov/0079.html
<klotz> ACTION: Leigh Klotz to ask Mark Seaborne for XForms 1.0 Basic implementation report status. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/21-forms-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-434 - Klotz to ask Mark Seaborne for XForms 1.0 Basic implementation report status. [on Leigh Klotz, Jr. - due 2007-11-28].
<Steven> Thanks!
<Steven> Yes I am
<John_Boyer> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Nov/0075.html
<klotz> ACTION: John Boyer to add example for inputmode to issues list (received indirectly as comment but after last call deadline) and to contact Yam. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/21-forms-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot-ng> Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - John
<trackbot-ng> Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. jkugelma, jboyer)
<NickVdB> this is my reply http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Nov/0082.html
<NickVdB> If you like I can sumerize
<NickVdB> ack, me
I would propose extending the existing telcon for an additional half hour, and reducing the FtF meeting to three instead of four
<Steven> +1 on value of FtFs
+1
<John_Boyer> +1
<CharlieWiecha> +1
<Roger> +2 (Rafa and me)
<wellsk> +1
<unl> +1 from me too, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Nov/0081.html
well.... how about 3 meetings a year and therefore a little longer telcon?
<CharlieWiecha> +1 on schnitz
<NickVdB> but the TPAC is in the 4th q
right
no
<NickVdB> For me it are seperate issues, the call times and the F2F meetings
ok
<NickVdB> and I'm fine with makeing call of 90 minutes
<NickVdB> that is fine for me
:-)
Great
+1 charlie
<NickVdB> that is fine for me too
<klotz> RESOLUTION: We go to 90 minute calls, starting 15 mintues earlier and ending 15 minutes later, in January.
<unl> lets do a 2 week f2f in victoria
unl, ?
<NickVdB> fine for me
;-)
<NickVdB> no
lets go camping for one month
<NickVdB> we want Victoria ;)
<unl> yes
;-)
Leigh, LOL
<NickVdB> sounds good for me
<unl> +1 for 4 day meetings
<wellsk> +1
<Steven> +0
well, we mean less meetings at the same time, no?
<NickVdB> 3 meetinings + TP
<Steven> If it is 3*4 days, then +1 for me
ICELAND, ICELAND!
(in the middle between US / EU)
<Steven> +1 to Iceland
<unl> ho will be the whost on iceland?
<Steven> IBM *must* have a site there ;-)
<unl> :-o
<NickVdB> no, then we loose victoria :(
ok
+1
no
right
no
right
<Steven> Calls of 90 mins
<Steven> 3 meetings of 4 days
<Steven> where TPAC= 2days+2virtual days
whereas one of the three meeting is half-virtual
<John_Boyer> Generally, 3 meetings of 4 days in total. The last of the year would be the TPAC. Two virtual days before the TPAC and then 2 days at the TPAC for those who can make it
<Steven> +1
right
<unl> so we're losing victoria next year?
<unl> :-(
<NickVdB> we will start a new group, to go to victoria
<unl> ok
<NickVdB> I was planning my summer holiday in Canada
<NickVdB> but next year wil do
<NickVdB> no problem ;)
<NickVdB> no pubblic holidays
<NickVdB> quite expensive ?
when is koeniginnen-tag?
<NickVdB> 31 april
ok
<NickVdB> soryy
<NickVdB> 30
<unl> earlier is better
<NickVdB> june is ok for me
<NickVdB> 9, 10, 11, 12
cool
<klotz> RESOLUTION: We resolve to have three F2F meetings per year, four days per meeting, and that the final meeting is half-virtual, half-TPAC.
<klotz> RESOLUTION: F2F in June 9-12, 2008 in Amsterdam
<NickVdB> ack, me
<Steven> Yay for Nick!
:-)
<Steven> Excellent
<unl> i'm willing to help wherever i can
<ebruchez> same here
<NickVdB> yes
I will be not helping at all, and do my best to hinder any development
just kidding :-)
<unl> we know
<NickVdB> help is welcome ;)
<NickVdB> John you are the 2.0 master
yep
John!
<wellsk> +1 for John
<CharlieWiecha> +1 for modules
<NickVdB> +1 for modules
bye: -)
<NickVdB> talk to you next week
<Roger_> byw
<klotz> Was Erik here?
<klotz> ?seen ebruchez
<CharlieWiecha> don't think so, no
<CharlieWiecha> but his line just hung up???
<klotz> OK, yes I see he was.
<CharlieWiecha> k
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.128 of Date: 2007/02/23 21:38:13 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/Regrets: Joern/Regrets: Joern, Rafael/ Succeeded: s/to/for/ Succeeded: s/ho/who/ No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: Schnitz Found Scribe: Leigh WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. Default Present: wellsk, +1.250.294.aaaa, John_Boyer, unl, Roger, +49.308.3.aabb, Charles_Wiecha, Schnitz, ebruchez, Blake, Nick_van_den_Bleeken, Leigh_Klotz, Steven, markbirbeck Present: wellsk +1.250.294.aaaa John_Boyer unl Roger +49.308.3.aabb Charles_Wiecha Schnitz ebruchez Blake Nick_van_den_Bleeken Leigh_Klotz Steven markbirbeck Regrets: Joern Rafael MarkS Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Nov/0079.html Got date from IRC log name: 21 Nov 2007 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2007/11/21-forms-minutes.html People with action items: boyer john klotz leigh WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]