See also: IRC log
CS: currently ~70 test samples in the
repository, all contributed by BenToWeb
... going through the Review Process
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/process
scribe: we've divided these into batches for (non-BenToWeb) participants to review
http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList
CS: some of the samples are ready for review
CS: however, some are missing the mapping to WCAG 2.0 techniques/failures
DLH: work for IBM ability center
... participating in WCAG WG but came late
... want to contribute to this task force
CS: thanks for joining us
DLH: how are the tests written? are they XML?
CS: the XML files are the metadata, they
reference the actual test files
... the metadata describe several other things such as expected result etc
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/usingTCDL
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2007Oct/0002.html
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/metadata/sc1.2.1_l1_001.xml
- <files>
<file xlink:href="../testfiles/sc1.2.1_l1_001.html" />
</files>
CS: working on an HTML view to visualize the XML data
DLH: what WCAG 2.0 version are we working from?
CS: from the last call working draft of 2006
SAZ: part of the review is to look out for that
CS: if not technique/failure mapping is in the XML, then its status should be marked as "deprecated"
DLH: i'd volunteer if i can help
<scribe> ACTION: SAZ set up CVS account for Drew [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/16-tsdtf-minutes.html#action01]
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/usingTCDL
<scribe> ACTION: CS send description of action item to DLH [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/16-tsdtf-minutes.html#action02]
DLH: so my action is to go through the XML and check the reference to the techniques?
<technique id="F8" xlink:href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20070517/#F8" />
DLH: to the 2006 or 2007 draft?
CS: the 2007 draft
... we still need reviewing of the test samples
http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList#
SAZ: there was an issue with these?
CS: some had "cannot tell" as output, other had
no mapping
... should be fixed now
<scribe> ACTION: SAZ will review all test samples marked "reviewer 03" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/16-tsdtf-minutes.html#action03]
<scribe> ACTION: TB continue working on "reviewer 01" tests [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/16-tsdtf-minutes.html#action04]
<scribe> ACTION: CV check with CI on taking a batch too [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/16-tsdtf-minutes.html#action05]
CS: applies to the ID attribute in the metadata
files, as well as the file names
... wanted to discuss with MC and SAZ, both had different opinions
SAZ: not opposed, just concerned about the
amount of work vs benefit
... but better to do now than later
CS: right now we used the wiki to manage the
tests
... working for current small amount of tests
... need to think about growth and scalability
... was looking into Testopia
SAZ: MWI folks are developing hand-grown
scripts and tools
... always the question of developing or adopting quirks
... systems team could install it for us, but we will need to configure and
maintain it
CS: requires perl, who knows perl?
SAZ: think we may need to stick to wiki until contribution or critical mass to work on something
CS: send example, SAZ sent comments
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2007Oct/att-0003/temp.html
CS: will work on SAZ comments, and send updated version
<scribe> ACTION: CS send updated version of the HTML view [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/16-tsdtf-minutes.html#action06]
<scribe> ACTION: all review HTML view once CS sends it out [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/16-tsdtf-minutes.html#action07]
next call on tuesday 30 october