See also: IRC log
Dunja: thanks for survey
feedback
... preference of group is for a mixed flyer
Dunja: 4 vs. 5 for "two flyers" vs. "mixed flyer"
Dunja: Majority prefers the cover page with the keys, possibly with small wording or image changes
<LeeF_> Dunja: data integration image for page 3 - big majority for Leo's image
<LeeF_> ...with some modification from a designer, and rewriting of additional info
<LeeF_> ...semantic web layer cake - 2 votes for it, 3 against, 4 for having it if it's a tech flyer
<LeeF_> ...I propose having it for a mixed flyer
<LeeF_> kidehen: don't think there's general support for layer cake being in the flyer
<LeeF_> Dunja: layer cake would be in the technical part of the mixed flyer
<LeeF_> kidehen: how about a high level technical architecture imagte?
<LeeF_> ivan: i would propose something different
<LeeF_> ...dunja, see if they can propose a version of the flyer based on the survey results
<LeeF_> ...then we can see whether the layer cake fits in
<LeeF_>ivan: I would propose that you produce a new version based on all the various replies so that we could have an overall view.
<leobard> +1 on that
<LeeF_> <group discussion on trying to reach consensus on a flyer as soon as possible>
<LeeF_> bengee: two meetings with the comm team
<leobard> bengee: they are going to create new proposals
<leobard> bengee: its quite demandig
<leobard> bengee: there is progress
<leobard> bengee: some logo will be integrated
<LeeF_> ivan: main difference between what we had and what the comm team wants is that there should be more emphasis on the overall Semantic Web
<danja> (no strong opinions re. flyer)
<LeeF_> ...comm team will make next proposal
<LeeF_> ivan: i have put in a new use case from Elsevier
<LeeF_> Elsevier use case
<LeeF_>ivan: we also have a commitment from Audi
<kidehen> http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/InfoGathering/WishList
<LeeF_> leobard: kingsley made improvements to web service, debugging going on
<LeeF_> ...task is to store RDF in an RDF store and make it usable
<leobard> http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/InfoGathering/WishList
<LeeF_> ...bug tracking system
<LeeF_> leobard: deeper problems regarding transformation and use of data
<LeeF_> ...data might not conform to any known ontology, manual work to massage
<LeeF_> kidehen: wishlist page has saved queries that show how to get at the data
Dunja: this is just a SPARQL + XSLT problem
<leobard> ivan: suggest a viewer (Frederic Giasson's)
<kidehen> kingsley: it is (will be) possible to use fresnel with the local viewer, too
<bengee> leobard: next step after data finetuning
<bengee> ... UI / portal
<bengee> ... will send another mail to the group for further ideas, implementation proposals
<bengee> ivan thinks Fred's browser or the obviously built-in Fresnel support could be an intersting start
<bengee> (cool uris for the semweb)
<bengee> two open questions
<bengee> leo not sure about next step
<bengee> ivan: either publish it via dfki
<bengee> or as a SWEO IG Note, but basically up to leo
<bengee> knowee: moving from concept pahse to design stage
<bengee> phase even
<bengee> skipping the remaining topics (survey, tech planery, f2f)