See also: IRC log
<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jun/0000
shadi: need to chase up dan bri for more info
... no need to drop earl:compound assertor for foaf:group class
... no changes in our current requirements
reinhard: agrees with JK's email
<scribe> ACTION: Shadi to write back to dan bri and cc the list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/06-er-irc]
johannes: has anyone checked out the classes referred to in foaf?
<JohannesK> <http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/20070524.rdf>
shadi: agrees that we need to have a closer look at this
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/#assertor
<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jun/0007
<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Jun/0001
shadi: has anyone reviewed johannes comments?
... are there any other points we need to discuss? nothing has really jumped
out at me
<scribe> ACTION: shadi to open a WBS form for responses to MOK doc [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/06-er-irc]
<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2007AprJun/0038
shadi: we need to review WCAG2.0 before review
period expires on june 29
... would be good to check the testability of criteria and how we can express
it in EARL
johannes: pseudo code is more for techies
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20070517/Overview.html#G94
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20070525/#test_auto_refresh
reinhard: thinks MOK test cases are more specific
drooks: also agrees, MOK easier to implement, its more concise
johannes: perhaps thats because MOK Basic tests are all machine testable and can be expressed as an algorithm
reinhard: looks like WCAG could also be written in pseudo code
shadi: i'll take this back to the WCAG WG
<scribe> ACTION: Shadi to open a WBS form for WCAG2.0 review comments [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/06-er-irc]
<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007May/0026
shadi: we also need to review POWDER
drooks: yes, im in the group
shadi: please keep us informed on what is going on
<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007May/0023
<JohannesK> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-powder-use-cases-20070525/#testresult>
<JohannesK> 5-10 November 2007
shadi: we shoud look at another f2f at end of
summer if possible
... can everyone please check timings and budget for f2f meetings
... i'll be going to boston and can represent ERT
<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007May/0041
RESOLUTION: accept response to issue 20