W3C

XML Security Specifications Maintenance WG Teleconference 4 June 2007, Distributed Meeting #5
5 Jun 2007

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Frederick_Hirsch, Konrad Lanz, EdSimon, jcc, Thomas, Hal, sean, grw, RobMiller, PHB
Regrets
Chair
Frederick Hirsch
Scribe
Konrad Lanz

Contents


Administrivia: scribe confirmation, next meeting

<tlr> Meeting: XML Sec WG weekly

<tlr> Date: 5 June 2007

HAL: not in office next meeting

<tlr> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0007.html

<tlr> Chair: fjh

Review and approval of last meeting's minutes

<fjh> minutes from last meeting http://www.w3.org/2007/05/29-xmlsec-minutes

RESOLUTION: minutes approved

3) Action item review

Action-26: draft CG note draft for submission to XML CG

<tlr> ACTION-26 continues

tlr: no progress
... couple of issues need resolution and interaction with the xml coordination group

Action-28: Propose additional types of contributions for workshop CFP

<scribe> Closed ACTION-28

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0047.html

Action-34 Verify that CR version of C14N11 has no conformance-affecting changes against http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xml-c14n11-20061220/

klanz2: no conformance affecting changes http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0014.html

ACTION-35 Review Konrad\\'s message re xml:base by next call

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/att-0044/Apendix.html

that's the related mail http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0044.html

fjh: still open and on rsalz

ACTION-36 Review KonraD\\'s message re xml:base by next call

jcc: action should be closed

<jcc> message from JC for action 36: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0010.html

ACTION-37 Review Konrad\\'s message re xml:base by next call

sean: ongoing

ACTION-38 Review Konrad\\'s message re xml:base by next call

??? Close ??? ACTION-38

@@@ No input on review: Did I miss some email / comment to close this Action ??? @@@

ACTION-39 Update editor\\'s draft according to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0042.html

CLOSE ACTION-39 Done, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0002.html

ACTION-40 Contact CAO Yongsheng confirming treatment of E1 in Decryption Transform

CLOSE ACTION-40 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0002.html

ACTION-41 Check his implementation wrt DNAME erratum

<Sean> ACTION: 41 to the Java SE implementation doesn't do any of the DNAME encoding rules; we just encode as RFC 2253 String [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action01]

Close ACTION-41

ACTION-42 Produce example for breakage due to current E01 language

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0009.html

Close ACTION-42

4) Workshop/CFP

fjh: submission for approval next wednesday

4a) Proposed changes to CFP, Frederick Hirsch

<fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0000.html

<tlr> fjh, chair hat off: sent message to list with some tweaks

fhj: add an item to capture other standards experience

<tlr> +1 to the proposed changes

<fjh> Experience and consequences of building other specifications or standards with the XML Signature and XML Encryption suites of specifications as a basis

<fjh> Insight into the interaction of the XML Security specifications with the evolving XML environment

fhj: other changes are editorial

RESOLUTION: Changes by fjh are accepted

<tlr> ACTION: thomas to update CFP draft as suggested in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0000.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-44 - Update CFP draft as suggested in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0000.html [on Thomas Roessler - due 2007-06-12].

<ptrimint> hi, I am Panos Trimintzios from ENISA .. just logged in (apologies for delay)

4b) Confirm workshop logistics: 25 & 26 September, 9-5, BEA, San Jose.

hal: largest room for people seated at tables for 30 people

<tlr> phb: can contact VERISIGN and see if there's a venue there

<tlr> ... have rooms that are large enough ...

phb: makes a case at verisign to get room

<tlr> http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/ws/cfp

fjh: can we get this out before next tuesday

tlr: give necessary information to phil

phb: will be able to tell in a couple of days

<fjh> ACTION: TLR to give information on hosting to PHB [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-45 - Give information on hosting to PHB [on Thomas Roessler - due 2007-06-12].

<tlr> ACTION-45 due right away

<fjh> ACTION: PHB to confirm hosting by end of the week [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action04]

<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-46 - Confirm hosting by end of the week [on Phillip Hallam-Baker - due 2007-06-12].

fjh: is it likely that verisign will host

tlr: there can't be NDAs

Dates

fjh: workshop nine to five
... considering changing the hosting from bea to verisign

4c) Other workshop issues.

fjh: willing to chair

tlr: there is critical mass to do program comittee work

fjh: on regular call or extra calls

tlr: if possible on regular calls
... split the burden among the group into sessions

fjh: different workgroup members should participate in recording session's outcome to generate final reports

NOTE: fjh offers to chair

5) Decryption Transform to Last Call

fjh: do not neded to wairt for response to ACTION-40

tlr: plan is to publish current editor's draft

<tlr> Pending changes: (1) namespaces; (2) change reference to C14N 1.1 to be more precise

<tlr> Group can either trust editors to do this and just move ahead to do Last Call FPWD, or look at updated draft @ next meeting

<tlr> I'm fine either way.

<fjh> ACTION: tlr and fjh to update editors draft for next meeting [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action05]

<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-47 - And fjh to update editors draft for next meeting [on Thomas Roessler - due 2007-06-12].

6) C14N11 Review

<fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0044.html

<fjh> klanz2: had action to determine if conformance changes between Dec and later version, none found

<fjh> ... wrote implementation to test, found a separate issue with algorithm in appendix

<fjh> ... proposed changed version , also added set of test cases

<fjh> ... primary issue .. processing

fjh: rsalz not on the call

<jcc> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0010.html

<fjh> klanz2: xpath filters not defined for canonicalization as such

jcc: example in section 3.8 does not relate XPATH-Filter

fjh: put proposal on the list

Create ACTION on jcc example in section 3.8 does not relate XPATH-Filter

<fjh> ACTION:: jcc to make proposal to resolve issue on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0010.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action06]

<tlr> ACTION: jcc to make proposal to resolve issue on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0010.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action07]

<trackbot-ng> Sorry, couldn't find user - jcc

<tlr> ACTION: cruellas to make proposal to resolve issue on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0010.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action08]

<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-48 - Make proposal to resolve issue on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0010.html [on Juan Carlos Cruellas - due 2007-06-12].

<fjh> jcc: asks for link to examples related to appendix a

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/att-0044/Apendix.html

that's the related mail http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0044.html

<fjh> sean: would help if konrad has examples showing output before changes he has made, and how different or change needed

chat is okay

<tlr> ACTION: konrad to illustrate proposed changes by example [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action09]

<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-49 - Illustrate proposed changes by example [on Konrad Lanz - due 2007-06-12].

<fjh> esimon2: +1 to sean

ed: +1 to sean

"no/.." -> "/" before

"no/.." -> "" now

7) Algorithm URIs; dsig-usage note

<fjh> http://www.w3.org/TR/DSig-usage/

tlr: we will have to use a different uri in the future
... given the input the uri will change
... how will the xml core wg react?

<fjh> klanz2: some changes to c14n11 needed, conformance changing, during C14N11 CR

8) Editorial review - XML Signature

<fjh> http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xmldsig-errata#E01

8a) Errata 01 (Distinguished Name) issue

sean: sun only does RFC 2253 and none of the special rules in XMLDSIG

<fjh> sean: key issue is whether rules are optional

ed: doesn't think the DNAME encoding rules are optional

<fjh> klanz2: was optional in text, lowercase should, test cases indicated this

<fjh> sean: need to know what implementations are doing

<fjh> klanz2: give warning regarding unusual DNames in certs, not common

ed: proposed some changes

<esimon2> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0050.html

sean: everything we do should be consistent with rfc 2253

<fjh> ack

<fjh> klanz: +1 to sean

<jcc> rfc 4514 obsoletes 2253

<fjh> klanz: see if whitespace etc matter

<esimon2> +q

<fjh> ... ok with warning

<fjh> klanz: changing RFC is conformance changing ?

<esimon2> Need to evaluate whether our changes to the DN description, etc. affect XKMS.

jcc: security considerations with DNAMES

<fjh> tlr: what was mean originally, if what was meat, is there is case for change

<fjh> ... capture in clear language what was meant originally

<fjh> ... clarify whether normative language

<jcc> section 7.2 of rf2253 (Use of distinguished names in security applications) warns about using the strings for identifying certificates. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0001.html

<PHB2> I think we need to get folk like Alex Deacon involved here

<PHB2> There are two sets of issues: what the specs say and what the applications do

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: 41 to the Java SE implementation doesn't do any of the DNAME encoding rules; we just encode as RFC 2253 String [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: : jcc to make proposal to resolve issue on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0010.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action06]
[NEW] ACTION: cruellas to make proposal to resolve issue on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0010.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action08]
[NEW] ACTION: jcc to make proposal to resolve issue on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0010.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action07]
[NEW] ACTION: konrad to illustrate proposed changes by example [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action09]
[NEW] ACTION: PHB to confirm hosting by end of the week [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: thomas to update CFP draft as suggested in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0000.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: tlr and fjh to update editors draft for next meeting [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action05]
[NEW] ACTION: TLR to give information on hosting to PHB [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action03]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.128 (CVS log)
$Date: 2007/06/12 18:00:15 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.128  of Date: 2007/02/23 21:38:13  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/clodsed//
FAILED: s/clodsed/closed/
Succeeded: s/Action 40/Action 41/
FAILED: s/Action 40/Action 41/
Succeeded: s/fhj/fjh/
Succeeded: s/fhj/fjh/
Succeeded: s/fhj/fjh/
Succeeded: s/langue/language/
Found Scribe: Konrad Lanz
Found ScribeNick: klanz2
Default Present: Frederick_Hirsch, klanz2, EdSimon, jcc, Thomas, Hal, sean, grw, RobMiller, PHB
Present: Frederick_Hirsch klanz2 EdSimon jcc Thomas Hal sean grw RobMiller PHB
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jun/0007.html
Found Date: 5 Jun 2007
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html

WARNING: No person found for ACTION item: : jcc to make proposal to resolve issue on  http://lists.w3.org/archives/public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007jun/0010.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-xmlsec-minutes.html#action06]

People with action items: 41 cruellas fjh jcc konrad phb thomas tlr
[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]