See also: IRC log
Previous minutes approved
<scribe> ACTION: [DONE] Philippe to send an issue to WS-A about a stronger reference to WS-Policy. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/26-ws-cg-minutes.html#action01]
Paul:Not much to report, we have a f2f next week in Sophia Antipolis. XML.com article and xmlschema-dev discussions
Chris: Nothing to report, very close to PER, still have to review the primer
Plh: you will have other WGs from this CG to review your docs.
Chris: down to 16 issues
Jonathan: Talks about features at risk. 3 items to talk about: HTTP binding. less interest from member than for the SOAP binding, but still some interest. it won't be removed. some MEPs are at risk as well. we have some MEP that are not used. the out-only is not referred to in the document, the group may extract those MEPs and publish them in a WG Note
Jacek: even if they are removed, will they in the same form of URI as the current ones?
Jonathan: yes
Jacek: that sounds like a good move to publish them in a WG note with the same kind or URIs.
Jonathan: last feature at risk is F&Ps. the group thinks that it is possible to remove them without impacting the implementation and the doc, one of our member is wanting to have a way to describe MTOM, currently it is defined only as a feature, so we are looking for a way to define MTOM without. using the whole F&P framework
skipped, see the addressing agenda item
not much since last time, working on the theoretical background note, and chasing impls
we are in sync with our timeline
- Guide to Versioning XML Languages using XML Schema 1.1
- Short namespace URIs for W3C TRs available
Jacek: SAWSDL will meet in Georgia mid-november
Jacek: people were not notified as I was away. not sure about the process
Plh: it might have been better to negociate the review time with other group prior to publication
jacek: groups targeted; WSDL, schema, databinding (although unofficially), the SemWeb and SWS IG, and the Semantic Execution Environment TC in OASIS
MSM: it will be a bit difficult considering the time frame
Philippe: CDL sent in the past a message saying that F&P were a good thing to keep
Yves: it would have been a nice hook to plug things needed for alignment, but there might be other ways to do it. also for MEP, there is need to support them at the CDL level, as messages are mostly one way at the CDL level
Jacek: in the case of MTOM, we can ask people unwilling to implement full fledge Policy processor, they can implement only the part relative to describing MTOM
Bob: since early july, got 2 issues, starting with one, rec-33 related to WSDL description and anonymous. Anish & Paco are tasked to provide a new resolution. We may go back on how we are relying on WSDL.
Jonathan: there is kind of loop around that issue between addressins and RX TC
Bob: there is still an option for a get-together on this topic. The WG sentiment is not to change the MUST in a SHOULD as it leaves room for badly done stuff
Philippe: looks like the only way to have addressing and RX agreeing will be by doing a joint call. also if there is a better alignment with Policy on anonymous, the doc will probably have to go back to WD
Felix: the i18n activity will start work in this area, the goal is do things like describing things like the locale using policy
presentation was made to the WSDL WG during the last plenary as well
early next week a pointer to the charter will circulate
Oct 10, Jonathan, Bob, Paul (MDA workshop), Philippe (FSTC) and Jacek won't be there
next call Oct 24th
ADJOURNED