See also: IRC log
<scribe> Scribe: JR
JA: Will right something up for programmatically determined.
<jallan> JR: Programmatically Determined:
<jallan> determined by software from data provided in a user-agent-supported
<jallan> [implemented by user agents and assistive technologies] manner such that
<jallan> the user agents [any software that retrieves and renders Web content for
<jallan> users] can extract and present this information to users in different
<jallan> modalities
<jallan> This may be more clear:
<jallan> Available in a user-agent-supported [implemented by user agents and
<jallan> assistive technologies] manner that supports unambiguous automatic
<jallan> processing by user agents [any software that retrieves and renders Web
<jallan> content for users].
(Context, this is a proposal JR sent to JA last week that JA has just pasted in)
<jallan> JA: revision: Available in a user-agent-supported [implemented by user agents and
<jallan> assistive technologies] manner that supports unambiguous automatic
<jallan> processing by user agents [any software that retrieves and renders Web
<jallan> content for users] for presentation to users in different modalities.
(context: JA pastes in his newer version)
<jallan> cleaner - Available in a user-agent-supported manner that supports unambiguous automatic
<jallan> processing by user agents for presentation to users in different modalities.
JA: Can live with this.
JR: So can I
Peter: So can I
<jallan> ACTION: JA to contact CL about change of definition vs. change all sc in wcag [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/05/25-ua-minutes.html#action01]
Peter: Prob can expect better reception from WCAG than suggesting changes to lots of success criteria
<jallan> 3.2.2 Changing the setting of any form control or field does not automatically cause a change of context (beyond moving to the next field in tab order) unless the authored unit contains instructions before the control that describe the behavior. [How to meet 3.2.2]
JA: Statement "(beyond moving to the next field in tab order)" should be removed since it undermines the whole thing
JR: Agreed
Peter: So why did they do
it?
... Perhaps there are situations eg phone numbers with a known
number of digits.
JA: If that clause is removed then it makes sense
JR, perter: Agreed
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.127 of Date: 2005/08/16 15:12:03 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: JR Inferring ScribeNick: JR Default Present: Jim_Allan, [IBM] Present: Jim_Allan [IBM] WARNING: Fewer than 3 people found for Present list! Regrets: Cathy Laws Got date from IRC log name: 25 May 2006 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2006/05/25-ua-minutes.html People with action items: ja WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]