See also: IRC log, previous 2006-04-24 record
RESOLVED: 24-swbp-minutes.html accepted as minutes of previous meeting
RESOLVED: next telecons 22 May, 5 June, 19 June
Announcement: -> Multimedia Semantics Incubator Group
ACTION: Ben to ask Gary (and Fabien) if they would review RDFa Primer doc [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/24-swbp-minutes.html#action18 [DONE]
Ben: I got a response from Gary, none from Fabien
DBooth: I believe I have an action to review as well
ACTION: Ben to send examples of bookmarklets highlighting RDFa marked up terms to WG list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/24-swbp-minutes.html#action19] [CONTINUES]
ACTION: Ben_Adida to find reviewers and put acknowledgements in [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/24-swbp-minutes.html#action20] [DONE]
ACTION: Ben give reviewers appropriate acknowledgement in RDF/A Primer [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/05/08-swbp-minutes.html#action04]
ACTION: DBooth to re-review RDFa draft by next teleconf (doc ready by Wed 26 Apr for review) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/24-swbp-minutes.html#action17] [CONTINUES]
DBooth: I'm happy to proceed with publication. One question: in Dublin Core, 'creator' is not required to be a URI
Ben: correct; that was one comment made on the first draft
DBooth: reading the examples, I felt I would like to see the RDF produced by the examples sooner, similar to section 3
Ben: good point, it depends on the audience how soon we felt it appropriate to introduce the RDF.The HTML folk feel introducing RDF later is better
Gary: I've looked at the document briefly, concentrating on the changes. I'm fine with proceeding with publication. I'd like to suggest some minor rearrangements. I did notice that the first example in section 2 appears to have missed the triple that Joe is speaking at the conference
Ben: thanks. The major change was adding the calendar example in section 2. We'd like to have this published before WWW2006
Guus: hearing the oral comments from the reviewers, I'll accept a proposal to publish this WD provided reviewer's comments are taken into account
DBooth: second
RESOLVED: RDF/A Primer publication request may be issued as soon as editor has incorporated today's feedback from reviewers
Ben: other updates from TF: we're talking with GRDDL folk about a transformation that would take microformats in-place into RDF/A. We're in early investigation of this and hope to have more information by June
ACTION: [DONE] Elisa to figure out who was 2nd reviewer of Time note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/24-swbp-minutes.html#action12]
Elisa: Jeremy and Libby were the reviewers. At the last telecon Libby reported that her comments had been addressed
ACTION: [DONE] Guus to review OWL Time note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-minutes.html#action09]
Guus: my review. The document needs work to make it consistent with the OWL file. I've documented the inconsistencies I found; let's wait for the reaction to my review
ACTION: Elisa to find correct latest version of part-whole draft. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/24-swbp-minutes.html#action09] [DONE]
Elisa: Alan says what's on the W3C site is his lastest draft but believes Chris may have a more recent draft
ACTION: Ralph copy http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~rector/swbp/simple-part-whole/simple-part-whole-relations-v0-2.html to WG area [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/24-swbp-minutes.html#action07] [DONE]
Ralph: that version on Alan's site is older than anything we have on the W3C site, so not copied, as we already have newer versions
<DeborahM> i am going to need to drop off but i wanted to make sure that we check if the semantic integration note is the latest
<DeborahM> since the one that is up dropped the author changes that chris welty put in in november
<DeborahM> it included at least natasha and me as authors for our contributions
Deb: an authorship change on the Semantic Integration Note was lost. I'm not sure if any other changes were also lost. I gave Chris a huge list of changes in November in Ireland. Most of the changes appear to be there, but not the authorship change
Elisa: if you email those to me I'll check with Mike that he did include everything
ACTION: [DONE] Elisa to ask Sem. Integ. editors to revise prior to final mtg [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/03-swbp-minutes.html#action04]
<Elisa> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Apr/0014.html
Elisa: editors hope to have something in a week or two
ACTION: Guus to sort out status of QCR note [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/03-swbp-minutes.html#action05] [DONE]
Guus: just sent mail; QCR draft
ACTION: Guus to propose a version of QCR note for review by 8 May teleconf [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/24-swbp-minutes.html#action10] [CONTINUES]
Guus: I've updated the editor's draft to not say it's a Working Draft. The main to-do on QCR note is to discuss the RDF/XML syntax. I will call Peter Patel-Schneider and following that discussion I think I'll be ready to propose QCR for review
ACTION: [DONE] Guus to ask Benjamin if he agrees to the WG publishing 23 Apr version with the above provisos. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/04/24-swbp-minutes.html#action16]
Guus: Benjamin responded; Review ACTION 16
Ralph: I'm working on making the URIs work, am about 2 hours away from finishing a program to generate those files
ACTION: Guus get Jacco to mail explicit consent to publish WordNet WD [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/05/08-swbp-minutes.html#action14]
DBooth: what did we decide about 303 redirects?
Ralph: I intend to serve the URIs with 303 redirects. ... the draft lists this as an open issue in Appendix I
Raphael: we are still working on the final version of the Image Annotation WD. We are accumulating a list of changes for the Note. We will close the TF as soon as the Note is published
[adjourned]