This document:Public document·View comments·Disposition of Comments·
Nearby:Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Other specs in this tool Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group's Issue tracker
Quick access to LC-1854 LC-1855 LC-1856 LC-1857 LC-1858 LC-1859 LC-1896 LC-1897 LC-1898 LC-1899 LC-1900 LC-1901 LC-1902 LC-1903 LC-1904 LC-1905 LC-1906 LC-1907 LC-1908 LC-1909
Previous: LC-1896 Next: LC-1859
"The tests do not assess usability, rather, they assess whether the content can be provided in a way that is likely to achieve a basic level of interoperability with mobile devices": [bryan] The tests seem to contradict this statement. There are aspects of usability and efficiency as well as interoperability that seem to be the focus of some of the MWBP recommendations, and in the MOT, the tests. For example: 3.1 AUTO_REFRESH and REDIRECTION (efficiency) 3.2 CACHING (efficiency) 3.5 DEFAULT_INPUT_MODE (usability) 3.6 EXTERNAL_RESOURCES (efficiency) 3.7 GRAPHICS_FOR_SPACING (efficiency, unless variations in spacing as rendered are meant as an interoperability problem) 3.12 MINIMIZE (efficiency) 3.14 NON-TEXT_ALTERNATIVES (usability) 3.16 PAGE_SIZE_LIMIT (efficiency, related to to the sum of all responses from an initial request) 3.17 PAGE_TITLE (usability) 3.19 PROVIDE_DEFAULTS (usability)