Edit comment LC-1726 for Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group

Quick access to

Previous: LC-1725 Next: LC-1720

Comment LC-1726
Commenter: Ben Cerbera Millard <cerbera@projectcerbera.com>

Resolution status:

> If "HTML Basic" existed I think there would be a good argument to
> specify it instead.

Since text/html work has started again at W3C in the form of the HTMLWG,
perhaps an "HTML Basic" spec would now be feasible? Then again, the 1998
attempt at this [7] didn't take off, so reduced HTML was not the solution
even with devices *that* limited. And since current mobiles handle full HTML
websites, degrading content at the origin server seems ever more unnecessary
(the network can do this on-the-fly if it needs to be done).

Sincere thanks for taking the feedback from the new HTMLWG seriously. I too
hope HTMLWG will add more practical value to the W3C's Mobile Web Initiative
(MWI) [8].
(space separated ids)
(Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)

Developed and maintained by Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (dom@w3.org).
$Id: 1726.html,v 1.1 2017/08/11 06:43:41 dom Exp $
Please send bug reports and request for enhancements to w3t-sys.org