This document:Public document·View comments·Disposition of Comments·
Nearby:SYMM Working Group Other specs in this tool
Quick access to LC-1920 LC-1921 LC-1922 LC-1923 LC-1924 LC-1925 LC-1926 LC-1927 LC-1928 LC-1929 LC-1930 LC-1931 LC-1932 LC-1933 LC-1934 LC-1935 LC-1936 LC-1937 LC-1938 LC-1939 LC-1940 LC-1941 LC-1942 LC-1943 LC-1944 LC-1945 LC-1946 LC-1947
Previous: LC-1938 Next: LC-1939
Dear SYMM WG- This is a Last Call review comment from the SVG WG on the SMIL Timesheets 1.0 specification, W3C Working Draft 10 January 2008, http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-timesheets-20080110/ . Please let us know if you have any questions by replying to www-svg@w3.org. 1 Introduction "An alternative to Timesheets is XHTML+SMIL [XHTMLplusSMIL] which gives full SMIL functionality as in-line in non-SMIL XML documents. On the other hand, SMIL itself gives full SMIL functionality as in-line XML-based document." The wording here is unclear, and seems to undermine the need for timesheets when XHTML+SMIL already exists. Can you please clarify? The first example seems to imply that timesheets can be used inline or externally, but this passages seems to counterindicate that. Also, what is the relationship of Timesheets and XHTML+SMIL to HTML+Time? [1] [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-HTMLplusTIME Regards- -Doug Schepers, on behalf of the SVG WG