W3C

Edit comment LC-1401 for Accessibility Guidelines Working Group

Quick access to

Previous: LC-1400

Comment LC-1401
:
Commenter: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org> on behalf of I18N WG

or
Resolution status:

Comment from the i18n review of:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20060427/

Comment 19
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-wcag2-techniques/
Editorial/substantive: E
Owner: RI

Location in reviewed document:
H62, Desc

Comment:
"Ruby annotation is unnecessary in languages such as Hebrew, where Unicode fonts can include diacritical marks that convey pronunciation. It is also unnecessary in English and European languages."


Note that Ruby provides for annotations that can equally well be used in non-Asian text. We suggest "Ruby annotation is uncommon in languages such as ".


(Note that the term Ruby derives from *English* typesetting practise.) (Note also that you actually include an example of Ruby used with English a little further down the page.)
(space separated ids)
(Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)


Developed and maintained by Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (dom@w3.org).
$Id: 1401.html,v 1.1 2017/08/11 06:42:15 dom Exp $
Please send bug reports and request for enhancements to w3t-sys.org