SWBPD RDF-in-XHTML TF

Ralph: ref. Ben's response to Christian Hoertnagl's comments, I suggest we add to the SOTD of the Editor's Draft a sentence saying that we expect this spec to be folded into the XHTML 2.0 specification. Along with that sentence we can provide a link to the HTML WG Patent Disclosure page, per the XHTML 2 WD

Jeremy: note that my implementation of the initial draft has now been in the public archive for over a year.

Jeremy: do we expect SWBPD telcons to end this month?

Ralph: no, I am anticipating an extension to the SWBPD WG charter to focus on completing specific tasks, including RDF-in-XHTML

Jeremy: CURIE question may be the most controversial still

Mark: we had a suggestion to move the details of CURIE to one place in the document

Jeremy: Noted DanC's response in DAWG to my comments on QName production in SPARQL grammar. it was late in the schedule to be making those sorts of editorial suggestions

Ralph: do we expect to check-in new edits before the SWBPD telecon on 9 Jan or do we ask the WG to review whatever version exists at that time?

Mark: I'm reluctant to proceed with WG review of the current editor's draft. I think I still have the write token for the spec document. I can try to have a new version before the SWBPD WG telecon on 9 Jan (at 1800 UTC).

Jeremy: I think the most critical item for us is to present the CURIE issue in the way we want.

Jeremy: for future telecons I'll have to leave at 5mins before the top of the hour

Mark: could we consider moving this telecon 1 hour earlier?

Ralph: I have another telecon just before this but I can query that group about swapping the time slots

[adjourned]