ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens?
should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Best Practices Document
- Raised by:
- Daniel Appelquist
- Opened on:
- 2005-09-08
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- RE: Zeno\'s paradox Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-22)
- RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from k.scheppe@t-online.net on 2007-03-21)
- RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-21)
- Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-21)
- Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-21)
- RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-21)
- RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-03-21)
- RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-21)
- Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-21)
- RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-21)
- Zeno\'s paradox Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-21)
- RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-20)
- RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-20)
- RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2007-03-20)
- RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2007-03-20)
- RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com on 2007-03-20)
- RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2007-03-20)
- RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2007-03-20)
- Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-03-19)
- Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from srowen@google.com on 2007-03-19)
- Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-19)
- RE: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-19)
- Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-19)
- Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from srowen@google.com on 2007-03-19)
- Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-19)
- Re: Can Walled Gardens be mobileOK? [reprise of ISSUE-8] (from srowen@google.com on 2007-03-19)
- [minutes] Thursday Apr 13 Teleconf (from dom@w3.org on 2006-04-13)
- RE: [minutes] Thursday Apr 13 Teleconf (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2006-04-13)
- RE: [minutes] Thursday Apr 13 Teleconf (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2006-04-13)
- RE: [minutes] Thursday Apr 13 Teleconf (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2006-04-13)
- Re: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from chaals@opera.com on 2005-09-15)
- RE: [agenda] Thusrday September 15 (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-15)
- [minutes] Thursday September 15, 2005 teleconference (from dom@w3.org on 2005-09-15)
- [agenda] Thusrday September 15 (from dom@w3.org on 2005-09-14)
- Re: [agenda] Thusrday September 15 (from parcher@icra.org on 2005-09-14)
- RE: [agenda] Thusrday September 15 (from gaaron@afilias.info on 2005-09-14)
- Re: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from dom@w3.org on 2005-09-13)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-09)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-09)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-09)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from Jyri.Hagman@nokia.com on 2005-09-09)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from jo@linguafranca.org on 2005-09-09)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from Tim@bango.com on 2005-09-09)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from rhys.lewis@volantis.com on 2005-09-09)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-09)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-09)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from jo@linguafranca.org on 2005-09-09)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-09)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from chen@research.att.com on 2005-09-09)
- ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2005-09-08)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from k.scheppe@t-online.net on 2005-09-08)
- [minutes] Teleconf Sept 8 (from dom@w3.org on 2005-09-08)
- Re: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from parcher@icra.org on 2005-09-08)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-08)
- Re: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from chaals@opera.com on 2005-09-08)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from Tim@bango.com on 2005-09-08)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from rjana@research.att.com on 2005-09-08)
- Re: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from chaals@opera.com on 2005-09-08)
Related notes:
Related to issue-3.
8 Sep 2005, 00:00:00Sorry -- issue-5.
8 Sep 2005, 00:00:00The group reached consensus on the fact that whether the openness of the access
is orthogonal to the MobileOK trustmark
(resolution reached on Sep 15 2005)
15 Sep 2005, 00:00:00Display change log