ISSUE-5
Should we be perscriptive on documenting different content architectures (eg use of middleware) in the recommendations document?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Best Practices Document
- Raised by:
- Daniel Appelquist
- Opened on:
- 2005-08-18
- Description:
e.g. is using a middleware something that can be required in our best practices
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [minutes] Summary of F2F meeting (from dom@w3.org on 2005-10-12)
- Re: Making it clear that adaptation is not mandatory (from dom@w3.org on 2005-09-23)
- RE: [agenda] Thusrday September 15 (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-15)
- [agenda] Thusrday September 15 (from dom@w3.org on 2005-09-14)
- Re: [agenda] Thusrday September 15 (from parcher@icra.org on 2005-09-14)
- RE: [agenda] Thusrday September 15 (from gaaron@afilias.info on 2005-09-14)
- RE: [agenda] BPWG Teleconf Thu Sep 1st (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-01)
- [agenda] BPWG Teleconf Thu Sep 1st (from dom@w3.org on 2005-08-31)
- RE: [agenda] BPWG Teleconf Thu Aug 25 (from Daniel.Appelquist@vodafone.com on 2005-08-25)
- [agenda] BPWG Teleconf Thu Aug 25 (from dom@w3.org on 2005-08-24)
- ISSUE-5: Should we be perscriptive on documenting different content architectures (eg use of middleware) in the recommendations document? (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2005-08-18)
- [minutes] Teleconference Aug 18 (from dom@w3.org on 2005-08-18)
Related notes:
2005-10-05 00:00:00: RESOLUTION: the Best Practices do not require use of content adaptation, but
that it is likely that a better user experience will be acheived on a wider
range of devices if it is used - Luca dissents
Display change log
