See also: IRC log
discussion of whether to remove SC (covered by other guidelines?)
<scribe> scribe: Michael
but we think there is reason to keep this - making clear reason for identification of error (not just that there was one)
could have techniques that identification of error can be in label or in list of errors at top of doc (optional)
<scribe> ACTION: Andi send updated draft of guide to L2 SC 1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/26-wcag-teamc-minutes.html#action01]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-teamc/2005Sep/att-0054/guidedoc2.htm
need to discuss when Tim is on the call to clarify
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-teamc/2005Sep/att-0040/GL25_L3_SC1_guide-doc.html
let's delete the "user needs it is intended to address" paragraph in favour of benefits
feels like we're missing a SC about providing instructions
came up at Brussels, declared usability?
not sure - example of date format, could person with cognitive disability have difficult if expected format isn't their national one?
but everyone needs that too
the "additional ... assistance" part covers what that would be though
question of what additional is additional to
Situation C isn't context-relevant help
might go into an Operable SC
keyboard operability
put in boneyard for now...
is this usability? ... but lots of Level 3 items push that line
this survived the axe at Brussels - but may have been because of WCAG 1 requirement about spell checking
are we restricted to "input error"?
stuff from Harvest about understandable 404s might fall under this guideline
<scribe> ACTION: Sophia propose issues from Harvest on list to discuss [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/09/26-wcag-teamc-minutes.html#action02]
<Sofia> Techniques harvest document: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2005/06/30-tech-harvest.html
http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Guideline_2.5#Glossary
avoid Web site or delivery unit language - we all like it, will it work in other languages?
clarification: we like avoiding that rats nest
resolution: go to survey on this
Team C Wiki: http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Team_C
also look at Team A's wiki: http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Guideline_3.2
resolution: action at http://www.w3.org/2005/09/08-wcag-teamc-minutes.html#action03 no longer a high enough priority
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.127 of Date: 2005/08/16 15:12:03 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: Michael Inferring ScribeNick: Michael Default Present: Michael_Cooper, Sophia_Celic, Sofia_Celic, Neil_Soiffer, Gian_Sampson-Wild, Andi_Snow_Weaver Present: Michael_Cooper Sophia_Celic Sofia_Celic Neil_Soiffer Gian_Sampson-Wild Andi_Snow_Weaver Regrets: Makoto_Ueki Takayuki_Watanabe Tim_Boland Katie_Haritos-Shea Gian_Sampson-Wild Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-teamc/2005Sep/0057.html Got date from IRC log name: 26 Sep 2005 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2005/09/26-wcag-teamc-minutes.html People with action items: andi draft guide of send sophia updated WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]