ISSUE-15: Keep Including MathML-P in csymbol and ci ?
Keep Including MathML-P in csymbol and ci ?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- All
- Raised by:
- Paul Libbrecht
- Opened on:
- 2007-07-25
- Description:
- MathML-presentation is allowed within ci and csymbol and the usage of this seems to be precisely for rendering purposes. This comes as a supplement to notation-documents and, to me, is bad since it duplicates the MathML-p tree at every-occurrence of the ci or csymbol element.
This approach also has the strong problem that it is left to computing engines to identify when to variables are equal. E.g. should <ci><mi style="font-weight:bold">b</mi></ci> and <ci><mi style="font-weight:700">b</mi></ci> be considered the same variable? (they are "CSS-equivalent" !)
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- No related emails
Related notes:
we have decided to keep this in pragmatic cMathML3, closing this issue
Michael Kohlhase, 8 May 2008, 06:22:12Display change log