- Requester and provider entities agree on the choice of
WSD/endpoint, AND
- They agree about what the WSD/endpoint denotes, BUT
- They disagree about the app semantics
We don't address app semantics, EXCEPT:
- The wsdl:targetNamespace,
identifies the application-defined semantics of the
component names (but doesn't define their semantics)
Per WebArch advice we could add something about the
message syntax namespace:
For any namespace that is used any
message syntax, the namespace URI SHOULD point to a document that
directly or indirectly defines the semantics of the vocabulary defined
that namespace.