See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 20 October 2009
<Bob> scribe: Fred Maciel
<Bob> scribenick: fmaciel
added issues 7553 and 7207 to agenda
added issue 7982 to agenda
Agenda approved as amended
<dug> 7 new issues
All seven new issues approved
RESOLUTION: minutes of Oct 13 approved
November F2F: FYI 7 registered observers
January F2F: No objection to dates (2010-01-26 through 2010-01-28).
Location is Sunnyvale, CA. See e-mail from Dave for more details.
<gpilz> +1 to creating issues - only way to track the comments
Need to create issue, review resolution with reviewer and see if reviewer agrees.
<dug> +1 to them opening the issues - that way they're worded correctly
<dug> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Oct/0018.html
<dug> When present, this OPTIONAL parameter .... (add OPTIONAL)
<dug> Add OPTIONAL to all specs/all optional policy parameters
RESOLUTION: Approved as amended with "OPTIONAL" text.
RESOLUTION: proposal in issue approved.
<dug> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7207
<dug> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Oct/0049.html
RESOLUTION: proposal approved.
<dug> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Oct/0045.html
Message 45 should be included in the bug as part of the proposal
RESOLUTION: approved with updated proposal including message 45
<dug> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7982
RESOLUTION: proposal accepted, resolved.
<dug> Latest note on this: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Oct/0044.html
<dug> sort of - proposal is here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Oct/0044.html the other link has some minor editorial tweaks.
<dug> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Oct/0041.html
<dug> 41 == proposal, 44 is editorial suggestions
Ram to review, postpone to next week
<Ram> Issue 7912 could be resolved today.
<asir> Didn't we eliminate some of the states at the Hursley F2F?
<dug> +1 to Subscriber/EventSink
<dug> zakim who is making noise?
<li> loud noise
<dug> I hear TONS of static
All willing to accept proposal except for
Ram who requests one more week
<dug> 7970 might be an easy one
<asoldano> perhpaps we can wait a week for this
<asir> the proposal sounds concrete enough
<DaveS> The identifier field was there already right?
<gpilz> yeah
<dug> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7912
<DaveS> +1
<dug> 7970 might be easy
<dug> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7970
<dug> proposal 1: A Web service that accepts requests to create subscriptions.
<Ram> I need more time to review this issue.
<dug> Proposal 2: A Web service that accepts requests to create subscriptions for a certain set of notification that might be generated.
<Bob> ACTION: Doug and Katy to produce a more concrete proposal for Issue-7912 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/10/20-ws-ra-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-118 - And Katy to produce a more concrete proposal for Issue-7912 [on Doug Davis - due 2009-10-27].
<Ram> This changes the notion that the event source generates the events.
<li> proposal 2 is better
<dug> for proposal 2: s/notification/notifications/
review and resolution posponed
RESOLUTION: proposal accepted.
<dug> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7969
resolution postponed