Web Services Resource Access Working Group Teleconference

11 Jan 2011


See also: IRC log


Alessio Soldano, Red Hat
Ashok Malhotra, Oracle Corp.
Bob Freund, Hitachi, Ltd.
Doug Davis, IBM
Gilbert Pilz, Oracle Corp.
Katy Warr, IBM
Li Li, Avaya Communications
Martin Chapman, Oracle Corp.
Ram Jeyaraman, Microsoft Corp.
Tom Rutt, Fujitsu, Ltd.
Yves Lafon, W3C/ERCIM
Asir Vedamuthu, Microsoft Corp.
Bob Natale, MITRE Corp.
David Snelling, Fujitsu, Ltd.
Fred Maciel, Hitachi, Ltd.
Jeff Mischkinsky, Oracle Corp.
Mark Little, Red Hat
Nathan Burkhart, Microsoft Corp.
Orit Levin, Microsoft Corp.
Paul Fremantle, WSO2
Paul Nolan, IBM
Prasad Yendluri, Software AG
Vikas Varma, Software AG
Wei Jun Kong, CA
Wu Chou, Avaya Communications
David Snelling, Fujitsu, Ltd.
Bob Freund, Hitachi, Ltd.
Alessio Soldano, Red Hat


<trackbot> Date: 11 January 2011

<Bob> scribenick: asoldano

<Bob> agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2011Jan/0033.html

<dug> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11696

dug, can 11696 be added to agenda?

Bob, ok, added to the agenda

Bob, agenda approved

Bob, minutes http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/10/12/2011-01-04.html approved

next f2f meeting

Bob, details for logistic are posted online

<dug> impls: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/testing/implementations.html

Bob, eventing optionality analysis:

Bob, xs:dateTime is at risk for wse:expires

Bob, wse:filter at risk too

scribe: discussions going on on wse:Reasons, which might be at risk, but it's not that a feature, is an informational element for humans ...

Bob, wse:Reason is not at risk

dug, why not removing that from the list of feature that can be at risk?

Bob, dateTime on risk in both renew and expires

Bob, Enumeration document has just one implementation

dug, I can check optional stuff in the spec is up2date

<li> thanks dug

dug, IBM might be able to implement enumeration

Bob, there's no requirement for the specs to proceed at the same time

Bob, and implementation can come from non w3c members too

Ram, from Microsoft side, nothing would be at risk for enumeration

Bob, transfer:

dug, propose removing "Support for empty resources" from doc

Bob, OK

Bob, fragment:

Bob, metadata exchange:

Bob, once we go to CR, we'll also notify what's at risk


<dug> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11696

<dug> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2011Jan/0020.html

dug, this to be solved by having enumeration match evening

RESOLUTION: 11696 resolved as proposed without objection

Closure of incorporated issues

RESOLUTION: working group agrees on incorporation of resolved issues and moves them to closed status without objection

Progression to CR

Bob, any objection to progress all specs to CR?

RESOLUTION: all specs can progress to CR without objection

dug, what about adding variations/sub-scenarios to the test scenarios?

<Katy> I need to drop off the call early, bye

Bob, propose to just focus on tests now

Bob, that's all for today

Bob, next meeting 25th

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.135 (CVS log)
$Date: 2011/01/26 15:38:57 $