ISSUE-28
fragmentInXML-28
Use of fragment identifiers in XML
- State:
- OPEN
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Tim Berners-Lee
- Opened on:
- 2002-10-31
- Description:
Do fragment identifiers refer to a syntactice element (at least for XML content), or can they refer to abstractions? Example from 17.2.2 SVG fragment identifiers : MyDrawing.svg#svgView(viewBox(0,200,1000,1000)); The SVG spec states "This form of addressing specifies the desired view of the document (e.g., the region of the document to view, the initial zoom level) completely within the SVG fragment specification." From Dan Connolly: Do you consider the quoted paragraph above in error? Or do you disagree with my interpretation of it, i.e. that MyDrawing.svg#svgView(viewBox(0,200,1000,1000)) identifes a view of the drawing, and not any particular XML element (nor other syntactic structure) in the document.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Minutes from 19th Sept (from rhys@volantis.com on 2007-09-20)
- TAG telcon (from on 2005-11-01)
- TAG Weekly (from on 2005-05-31)
- TAG (from on 2005-05-10)
- Tag weekly meeting Feb 7, 2005 (from on 2005-02-07)
- Tag weekly meeting Feb 7, 2005 (from on 2005-02-07)
- Minutes of 12-14 May 2004 TAG FTF meeting in Boston (from on 2004-05-12)
- Minutes of 12-14 May 2004 TAG FTF meeting in Boston (from on 2004-05-12)
- Minutes of 12-14 May 2004 TAG FTF meeting in Boston (from on 2004-05-12)
- Minutes of 4 Nov 2002 TAG teleconference (from on 2002-11-04)
- Re: Use of fragment identifiers in XML (from Dan Connolly
on 2002-10-31)
Related notes:
2007-08-24 00:00:00: hmm... tracker doesn't distinguish between "decided" and "all relevant work done"
The TAG decided the main points of this issue in May 2004
http://www.w3.org/2004/05/14-tag-summary#fragmentInXML-28
Chris took the ball at that point; later HT picked it up.
http://www.w3.org/2005/02/07-tagmem-minutes#action12
I consider that action withdrawn/moot, but I think we still have work to do on this issue.
Display change log.