ISSUE-37

abstractComponentRefs-37

Definition of abstract components with namespace names and frag ids

State:

OPEN

Product:

Raised by:

Opened on:

2003-02-03

Description:

Is it wise to use fragment IDs for identifying abstract components within a namespace, even though it is the most natural and convenient mechanism? Is there another mechanism that would be preferable?
 

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. TAG F2F 14 June 2006 (from on 2006-06-14)
2. TAG F2F 14 June 2006 (from on 2006-06-14)
3. SV_MEETING_TITLE (from on 2006-05-16)
4. TAG telcon (from on 2005-11-01)
5. TAG (from on 2005-10-25)
6. RE: simple case of IRIs for Components in WSDL 2.0 (from Dan Connolly on 2005-09-27)
7. TAG in Edinburgh 21 Sep (from on 2005-09-21)
8. TAG in Edinburgh 21 Sep (from on 2005-09-21)
9. Minutes of TAG face-to-face meeting, 14-16 June 2005, Cambridge, MA, USA (from on 2005-06-16)
10. W3C TAG Telcon (from on 2005-05-03)
11. Technical Architecture Group (TAG) Weekly Teleconference (from on 2005-02-22)
12. Minutes of 2 March 2004 TAG FTF meeting in Cannes-Mandelieu (France) and WG Liaisons (from on 2004-03-02)
13. Minutes of 20 October 2003 TAG teleconference (from on 2003-10-20)
14. Minutes of 20 October 2003 TAG teleconference (from on 2003-10-20)
15. Minutes of 20 October 2003 TAG teleconference (from on 2003-10-20)
16. Minutes of 6-8 October 2003 TAG face-to-face meeting in Bristol (from on 2003-10-08)
17. Minutes of 6-8 October 2003 TAG face-to-face meeting in Bristol (from on 2003-10-08)
18. Minutes of 23 June 2003 TAG teleconference (from on 2003-06-23)
19. Minutes of 5 May 2003 TAG teleconference (from on 2003-05-05)
20. Minutes of 14 Apr 2003 TAG teleconference (from on 2003-04-14)
21. Minutes of 24 Mar 2003 TAG teleconference (from on 2003-03-24)
22. Minutes of 24 Mar 2003 TAG teleconference (from on 2003-03-24)
23. fragmentInXML-28: WSDL component designators (from Jonathan Marsh on 2003-02-03)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log.