ISSUE-37: Definition of abstract components with namespace namesand frag ids
abstractComponentRefs-37
Definition of abstract components with namespace namesand frag ids
- State:
- OPEN
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Tim Berners-Lee
- Opened on:
- 2003-02-03
- Description:
- Rank: Background
Recommendation: Confirm that WSDL2.0 does this, and that we've had no pushback, then close this
Note: Issue status incompletely researched (3/3/09)
Issue scope: Originated with the need in WSDL to identify e.g. individual ports based on port declarations in a WSDL doc. They used fragIDs for this, and asked if it were OK.
Is it wise to use fragment IDs for identifying abstract components within a namespace, even though it is the most natural and convenient mechanism? Is there another mechanism that would be preferable?
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Draft minutes from 2012-11-08 (from jeni@jenitennison.com on 2012-11-28)
- Re: TAG Minutes for Nov. 8 (from ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) on 2012-11-28)
- HashInURI notes (from nathan@webr3.org on 2011-03-09)
- Draft minutes of the 8-10 February 2011 TAG F2F Meeting are now available (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-02-21)
- Draft minutes of the 8-10 February 2011 TAG F2F Meeting are now available (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-02-21)
- TAG Members: please reviews status of issues you 'shepherd' by Monday, 8 March (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2010-03-03)
- Re: [State of HTML WG Unresolved Issues] (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-08-25)
- [State of HTML WG Unresolved Issues] (from raman@google.com on 2009-08-25)
- Setting TAG Priorities - Review of discussion and planning to date (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-22)
- Agenda for TAG Face-to-Face Meeting, 3-5 March 2009 (Redwood Shores, CA) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-02-25)
- TAG F2F 14 June 2006 (from on 2006-06-14)
- TAG F2F 14 June 2006 (from on 2006-06-14)
- SV_MEETING_TITLE (from on 2006-05-16)
- TAG telcon (from on 2005-11-01)
- TAG (from on 2005-10-25)
- RE: simple case of IRIs for Components in WSDL 2.0 (from Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> on 2005-09-27)
- TAG in Edinburgh 21 Sep (from on 2005-09-21)
- TAG in Edinburgh 21 Sep (from on 2005-09-21)
- Minutes of TAG face-to-face meeting, 14-16 June 2005, Cambridge, MA, USA (from on 2005-06-16)
- W3C TAG Telcon (from on 2005-05-03)
- Technical Architecture Group (TAG) Weekly Teleconference (from on 2005-02-22)
- Minutes of 2 March 2004 TAG FTF meeting in Cannes-Mandelieu (France) and WG Liaisons (from on 2004-03-02)
- Minutes of 20 October 2003 TAG teleconference (from on 2003-10-20)
- Minutes of 20 October 2003 TAG teleconference (from on 2003-10-20)
- Minutes of 20 October 2003 TAG teleconference (from on 2003-10-20)
- Minutes of 6-8 October 2003 TAG face-to-face meeting in Bristol (from on 2003-10-08)
- Minutes of 6-8 October 2003 TAG face-to-face meeting in Bristol (from on 2003-10-08)
- Minutes of 23 June 2003 TAG teleconference (from on 2003-06-23)
- Minutes of 5 May 2003 TAG teleconference (from on 2003-05-05)
- Minutes of 14 Apr 2003 TAG teleconference (from on 2003-04-14)
- Minutes of 24 Mar 2003 TAG teleconference (from on 2003-03-24)
- Minutes of 24 Mar 2003 TAG teleconference (from on 2003-03-24)
- fragmentInXML-28: WSDL component designators (from Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com> on 2003-02-03)
Related notes:
Original issue: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?type=1#abstractComponentRefs-37
Henry S. Thompson, 3 Mar 2009, 23:08:21Display change log