ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term>

Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term>

State:

CLOSED

Product:

R2RML

Raised by:

Souripriya Das

Opened on:

2011-08-30

Description:

Around LC deadline discussion, see http://www.w3.org/2011/08/30-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#item02

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: Revised SKOS-based translation table proposal (from SOURIPRIYA.DAS@oracle.com on 2011-11-27)
2. Re: Revised SKOS-based translation table proposal (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-11-21)
3. Re: Revised SKOS-based translation table proposal (from SOURIPRIYA.DAS@oracle.com on 2011-11-21)
4. Re: Revised SKOS-based translation table proposal (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-15)
5. Revised SKOS-based translation table proposal (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-11-15)
6. ISSUE-72 (lookup-table2): Bring back R2RML lookup tables [R2RML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-11-07)
7. Re: LC publication (from souripriya.das@oracle.com on 2011-09-15)
8. Re: LC publication (from michael.hausenblas@deri.org on 2011-09-15)
9. Re: LC publication (from souripriya.das@oracle.com on 2011-09-15)
10. Re: LC publication (from souripriya.das@oracle.com on 2011-09-15)
11. Re: LC publication (from michael.hausenblas@deri.org on 2011-09-15)
12. Re: LC publication (from souripriya.das@oracle.com on 2011-09-15)
13. Re: LC publication (from souripriya.das@oracle.com on 2011-09-15)
14. Re: LC publication (from michael.hausenblas@deri.org on 2011-09-15)
15. Re: LC publication (from souripriya.das@oracle.com on 2011-09-15)
16. Re: LC publication (from michael.hausenblas@deri.org on 2011-09-15)
17. Re: LC publication (from michael.hausenblas@deri.org on 2011-09-15)
18. Re: LC publication (from souripriya.das@oracle.com on 2011-09-15)
19. Re: LC publication (from michael.hausenblas@deri.org on 2011-09-15)
20. Re: LC publication (from bvillazon@fi.upm.es on 2011-09-15)
21. Re: LC publication (from SOURIPRIYA.DAS@oracle.com on 2011-09-14)
22. Re: LC publication (from bvillazon@fi.upm.es on 2011-09-14)
23. Re: LC publication (from bvillazon@fi.upm.es on 2011-09-14)
24. Re: LC publication (from souripriya.das@oracle.com on 2011-09-14)
25. LC publication (from michael.hausenblas@deri.org on 2011-09-14)
26. Minutes of 2011-09-13 telecon (from michael.hausenblas@deri.org on 2011-09-13)
27. Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-09-13 meeting 1600 UTC (from bvillazon@fi.upm.es on 2011-09-13)
28. Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> (from michael.hausenblas@deri.org on 2011-09-13)
29. Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> (from tthibodeau@openlinksw.com on 2011-09-13)
30. RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-09-13 meeting 1600 UTC (from Michael.Hausenblas@deri.org on 2011-09-12)
31. Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> (from souripriya.das@oracle.com on 2011-08-31)
32. Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> (from ashok.malhotra@oracle.com on 2011-08-30)
33. Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> (from souripriya.das@oracle.com on 2011-08-30)
34. Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> (from souripriya.das@oracle.com on 2011-08-30)
35. Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> (from dmcneil@revelytix.com on 2011-08-30)
36. Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-08-30)
37. Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> (from souripriya.das@oracle.com on 2011-08-30)
38. Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> (from dmcneil@revelytix.com on 2011-08-30)
39. Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> (from souripriya.das@oracle.com on 2011-08-30)
40. Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-08-30)
41. Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> (from dmcneil@revelytix.com on 2011-08-30)
42. Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-08-30)
43. Re: ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> (from dmcneil@revelytix.com on 2011-08-30)
44. Raising issues/actions for Souri's comments (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-08-30)
45. ISSUE-66: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping <DB value(s), RDF term> (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-08-30)

Related notes:

Display change log