- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:47:38 +0100
- To: Elias Sinderson <elias@soe.ucsc.edu>
- CC: webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Elias, thanks for the agenda. I've worked on some of the issues, attendees of the conference call (and of course everybody else) may want to check the following proposed changes (maybe having spec-ready text will help resolving these issues quickly). In particular: > 172 <http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172> - > Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it (consensus > issue) <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-rfc2518bis-latest.html#opaquelocktoken> > 10 <http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10> - > Round-tripping namespace decls in properties > (Need to hammer out text, as none has been proposed) <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-rfc2518bis-latest.html#property_values> > Minor: > 186 <http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186> - > opaquelocktoken appendix > (Perhaps resolved in earlier discussion of issue 172.) (again) <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-rfc2518bis-latest.html#opaquelocktoken> > Trivial: > 174 <http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174> - > Terminology in 4.4: "namespace name in scope" > (Should be easy to reach consensus.) gone with the proposed rewrite (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-rfc2518bis-latest.html#property_values>) Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2005 18:50:13 UTC