- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:16:20 +0200
- To: 'webdav' <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Elias Sinderson wrote: > > Julian Reschke wrote: > >> There hasn't been any feedback on my summary. [...] > > > Sorry, just really busy of late. I've just sent the bugzilla issues list > to the printer to review... Could we add the bugzilla issues to the HTML > open issues list? Alternately, perhaps link to the bugzilla issues from > the HTML issues list? Actually, most of the open Bugzilla issues should have been closed long ago. It's a shame that a new tracking system and last call procedure were introduced, and then the WG doesn't stick to the process that was agreed upon. I have trouble taking Issue 76 (<http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76>) seriously; anyway I've replied to it and never heard back from the author, and no votes are on it. Issues 77 and 78 (<http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77>, <http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78>) now link back to <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-issues.html#2.6_bindings_vs_properties>. >> So it would be really nice if those who think there are problems with >> the latest BIND draft either follow up on this, or alternatively agree >> to submit it to the IESG for last call. > > > +1 Thanks, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2005 20:16:32 UTC