[w3ctag/design-reviews] SMS Receiver API (#391)

こんにちはTAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of:

  - Name: SMS Receiver API
  - Specification URL: not yet available
  - Explainer (containing user needs and example code)¹: [explainer](https://github.com/samuelgoto/sms-receiver/blob/master/README.md)
  - GitHub issues (if you prefer feedback filed there): [issues](https://github.com/samuelgoto/sms-receiver/issues)
  - Tests: [WPT](https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/third_party/blink/web_tests/external/wpt/sms/)
  - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification): @samuelgoto, @sso-google

Further details:

  - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: [please provide]
  - [x] I have read and filled out the [Self-Review Questionnare on Security and Privacy](https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/). The [assessment is here](url).
  - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [API Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/)
  - The group where the work on this specification is:

We recommend the explainer to be in [Markdown](https://github.github.com/gfm/). On top of the [usual information expected in the explainer](https://w3ctag.github.io/explainers), it is strongly recommended to add:

  - Links to major pieces of multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification: 
  - Links to major unresolved issues or opposition with this specification:

You should also know that...

[please tell us anything you think is relevant to this review]

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please select one):

  - [x] open issues in our GitHub repo for each point of feedback
  - [ ] open a single issue in our GitHub repo for the entire review
  - [ ] leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify [github usernames]

--------------------------

_Please preview the issue and check that the links work before submitting._ In particular, if anything links to a URL which requires authentication (e.g. Google document), please make sure anyone with the link can access the document.

¹ For background, see our [explanation of how to write a good explainer](https://w3ctag.github.io/explainers).


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/391