- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 16:48:37 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
fantasai has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:
== [css-lists-3] Should automatic list-item increment adjust for ol[reversted]? ==
The list-item counter is defined to automatically increment by one on each element with `display: list-item`. (See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3686 for how that works.) `<ol reversed>` lists need to have a list-item increment of -1.
Should this be done by magic interactions with the host language, or should the UA style sheet simply include `ol[reversed] > li { counter-increment: list-item -1; }`?
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4181 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2019 16:48:39 UTC