- From: Renato Iannella via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:49:14 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
riannella has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/poe: == Clarify the Party cardinality for Perms/Prohibs == >From simon: The current spec states (comments inline; similar for prohibition): > 3.4 Permission > > The Permission entity indicates the Actions that the assignee is permitted to perform on the associated Asset. It is not required for perm/proh to have any party assigned. > In other words, what the assigner (supplier) has granted to the assignee (consumer). I would argue that not every assigner/assignee has the role of a supplier/consumer. > [...] > Party: the Permission MUST refer to one or more Party entities linked via the Role entity (see Section 2.3.1) (OPTIONAL) Is it possible to combine MUST and OPTIONAL? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/69 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:49:20 UTC