Re: Please Open ISSUE-34 (good standing)

On September 16, 2014 at 9:07:14 AM, Daniel Glazman (daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com) wrote:
> >
>  
> AFAIK, the oldest WG in the Consortium, the CSS WG, has never used  
> Standing. Each time we discussed it, it was either impractical  
> or impossible. I think we should be able to ditch it _entirely_ except  
> in the case of AB and TAG.

I have to agree with Daniel here (and we *never* agree on anything :)). Ditch it. 

Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 13:16:29 UTC