- From: Pratik Datta <pratik.datta@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "Cantor, Scott E." <cantor.2@osu.edu>, public-xmlsec@w3.org
I see that both XML 1.0 and XML 1.1 define whitespace in the same way. S ::= (#x20 | #x9 | #xD | #xA)+ Are you suggesting that we put in a reference to the XML 1.0/1.1 specification that defines this whitespace? Pratik -----Original Message----- From: Cantor, Scott E. [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu] Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 7:05 AM To: Pratik Datta; public-xmlsec@w3.org Subject: Re: Changes to C14N20 for ACTION-794, ACTION-799 and ACTION-800 On 6/6/11 3:35 AM, "Pratik Datta" <pratik.datta@oracle.com> wrote: >http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/c14n-20/ > >Changes for whitespace >In Section 2.3, added this line into "Text Nodes" > - Whitespace consists of space (#x20) characters, carriage returns, line >feeds, or tabs. This should be a reference to XML, no? Does XML 1.0 vs. 1.1 affect this at all? -- Scott
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2011 15:50:08 UTC