- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:55:01 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> Ian Hickson, Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:37:29 +0000 (UTC):
> > On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Richard Ishida wrote:
> > We can make the pragma entirely non-conforming instead of conforming
> > with a warning, if that would help. [...]
>
> As surprise to the Mozilla community? What about the just mentioned
> "matching implementations" motto? [1]
Making it non-conforming doesn't affect implementations, see the change
proposal. It only affects authors and validators.
> In zero change proposal (Mark IV) you claim: [2]
>
> ]]
> POSITIVE EFFECTS
> * Encourages authoring behaviour compatible with both legacy user
> agents
> and with conforming user agents.
> [[
>
> But here is an example to prove that it is not true:
>
> div[lang=""]:lang(en){background:red}
That's got nothing to do with Content-Language processing; the same bug
can be shown purely with lang="" attributes. Gecko doesn't implement the
part of HTML5 that says that "" is to be treated as a language code.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 9 April 2010 00:55:29 UTC