Re: ACTION-605 Propose more detailed text about relationship to use case note, based on previous call's minutes

As we discussed in the meeting, the process for updating the note at this 
time is pretty heavyweight, so it's easier for us to specify that list 
somewhere else. 





From:   Joe Steele <steele@adobe.com>
To:     Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Cc:     WSC WG public <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Date:   06/04/2009 05:16 PM
Subject:        Re: ACTION-605 Propose more detailed text about 
relationship to use   case note, based on previous call's minutes
Sent by:        public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org



Are we allowed to change the use-cases document any more or is that 
finalized?

If we are ? it might make sense to simply say in the wsc-ui Overview 
section that some use cases are not handled and that they are called out 
in the use-cases document individually. 

Joe

On 6/3/09 11:34 AM, "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org> wrote:

Thanks for checking in.  I think we need both, but I believe that a 
conversation between Mez and me is in the critical path for the 
section 10 piece.

Thanks,
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>





On 3 Jun 2009, at 20:31, Joe Steele wrote:

> I need more clarification here. I thought the action was to propose 
> updated text for the Overview section discussing the testing from 
> section 10 of the use-cases document. I realize we also need to 
> propose updated text discussing the use cases we do not handle from 
> use-cases section 9.
>
> Should I be looking at both?
>
> The latter is relatively straightforward and I will knock that out 
> this week. The former is more difficult since I do not recall the 
> status of each of the testing areas. I will probably need some help 
> on that one, specifically the robustness testing.
>
> Joe