Re: Proposal for ISSUE-65

All --

Thank you; this discussion helped clarify my own thinking.

> [[
> PROPOSAL: For a foreign key of any arity, the reference property 
> IRI is of the form <Table#ref-attr1-attr2-...-attrn>. This will 
> address ISSUE-65
> ]]


On Aug 29, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Juan Sequeda wrote:
> So I guess we are down to choosing between '.' and '-'

In my experience, '-' is far more commonly used within SQL
identifiers than '.', and thus likely to cause more confusion,
even if both do require escaping.  '.' is consistently used as
a separator; this is just a different kind of separation.

So, my preference is for '.' ... and I expect to be on the call.


> Can we just vote on this tomorrow and close this issue?

*crossing my fingers*

Ted


> Juan Sequeda
> +1-575-SEQ-UEDA
> www.juansequeda.com

--
A: Yes.                      http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html
| Q: Are you sure?
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
Evangelism & Support         //        mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
                             //              http://twitter.com/TallTed
OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
        10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 265, Burlington MA 01803
                                 http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/uda/
OpenLink Blogs              http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/virtuoso/
                               http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
    Universal Data Access and Virtual Database Technology Providers

Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2011 15:09:30 UTC