- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:50:36 +0000
- To: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- CC: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi James, Yes, I agree with your conclusion. I don't see this problematic for the formal semantics to Things underlying Entities. Maybe, another way of phrasing it, is what is it we want to create descriptions of. Luc On 01/24/2012 10:41 AM, James Cheney wrote: > > I think these perspectives are mutually reconcilable, as long as it's > OK for the formal semantics to talk about Things as a model of the > underlying reality that Entities are trying to describe/surrogate. > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 10:51:16 UTC