Re: PROV-ISSUE-152 (QualifiedInvolvement): will the QualifiedInvolvement approach work for other relations? [Ontology]

yes, Daniel, it's now overtaken by events. The issue can be closed.

On 05/03/2012 16:49, Daniel Garijo wrote:
> Hi Luc,
> Right now we have used "Involvement" to qualify the different properties.
> The property that links "Elements" with "Involvements" is qualified.
> There is an additional issue about being able to express things with 
> the ontology
> that we are not able to express in the DM (issue 
> https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/262),
> so I propose to close this issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
> 2011/11/18 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker 
> <sysbot+tracker@w3.org <mailto:sysbot%2Btracker@w3.org>>
>
>
>     PROV-ISSUE-152 (QualifiedInvolvement): will the
>     QualifiedInvolvement approach work for other relations? [Ontology]
>
>     http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/152
>
>     Raised by: Luc Moreau
>     On product: Ontology
>
>
>     The prov-o document has introduced a qualifier for participation,
>     which is not in prov-dm.  There is increasing evidence that it is
>     useful to qualify all/most relations of prov-dm.
>
>     Is the approach for qualifiedInvolvement be extensible for all
>     relations? In particular, for Activity -> Activity relations, such
>     as wasInformedBy.
>
>     QualifiedInvolvement seems to have "The hadQualifiedEntity
>     property links the QualifiedInvolvement class with the Entity
>     class.". But wasInformedBy does not have entity?
>
>     Thoughts?
>
>     Note, this issue shouldn't block the release of the document as fpwd.
>
>
>
>
>