- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:04:40 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Apr 8, 2010, at 4:51 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 08.04.2010 10:27, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> ... >>> And here is the diff: >>> http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=4985&to=4986 >>> >>> Is that an acceptable basis for an amicable resolution? >> >> This still defines the .profile IDL attribute though. As stated, I >> would be ok with this, but I would prefer to remove it entirely to >> keep things from colliding with whatever the @profile spec defines. >> ... > > Well, even if a @profile spec wanted to define the IDL differently, > could it? Yes. Well, it couldn't remove what HTML5 does but it could add it to all elements if it was useful. > > Personally, I don't see any need of specific DOM support at all. Compatibility with existing content would be the only reason IMO. Mozilla removing it should be a good experiment to see if we need the DOM attribute for compatibility. - Maciej
Received on Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:05:18 UTC