- From: RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 14:53:12 +0000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
shapes-ISSUE-92 (additive repeated properties): Should repeated properties be interpreted as additive or conjunctive? [SHACL Spec] http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/92 Raised by: Eric Prud'hommeaux On product: SHACL Spec Dublin Core experience suggests that users expect multiple constraints on the same property to be "additive". For example <BFPersonInterface1> sh:property [ sh:predicate bf:identifiedBy ; sh:pattern "^http://id.loc.gov/" ] , [ sh:predicate bf:identifiedBy ; sh:pattern "^http://viaf.org/" ] . would be interpreted as requiring one bf:identifiedBy arc starting with "http://id.loc.gov/" and another starting with "http://viaf.org/". The current SHACL behavior is that multiple property constraints on the same predicate are "conjunctive", meaning that any triple with that predicate is expected to match all of property constraints. Are there use cases for this?
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2015 14:53:16 UTC