shapes-ISSUE-86 (dimitris): Associating shapes with ontologies or vocabularies [SHACL Spec] from RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker on 2015-09-10 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from September 2015)

From: RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:09:33 +0000
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1ZZwvF-000Co1-49@maia.w3.org>

shapes-ISSUE-86 (dimitris): Associating shapes with ontologies or vocabularies [SHACL Spec]

http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/86

Raised by: Dimitris Kontokostas
On product: SHACL Spec

Related to ISSUE-44, this is issue is about ways to associate an ontology or vocabulary to a set of shapes.

Possible ways to resolve it
a) SHACL spec says nothing about associating ontologies/vocabularies with shapes
b) SHACL spec suggests the use of owl:imports
c) SHACL spec suggests the use of sh:shapesGraph
d) SHACL spec suggests shapes are defined in the same file with the ontology/vocabulary
e) SHACL spec suggests a combination of (d) with (b) or (c)

Received on Thursday, 10 September 2015 08:09:36 UTC